serverless-graphql VS mangum

Since then, the ecosystem has changed. Using the Serverless Framework makes deployment simpler. We released the managed Tracetest App making any serverless-based systems simpler to instrument and test. You can now test public-facing apps with no infra overhead!

We see some great results from using these in conjunction with frameworks such as SST or Serverless, and also some real spaghetti from people who organically proliferate 100’s of functions over time and lose track of how they relate to each other or how to update them safely across time and service. Buyer beware!

When we think about AWS serverless service, the first thing that comes to our mind is Lambda function. Yes, the quickest way to deploy this backend Express JS app to AWS is to deploy it as a Lambda function. The easiest way is using Serverless Framework.

Serverless Framework: https://www.serverless.com/

Github | Website

In this example, we're using the serverless framework to quickly set up the Lambda function along with an API gateway for the entry point. The lambda function is a simple Koa REST API with a few functional endpoints.

Naturally, there are several options available to declare your cloud resources. The options with the most popularity are the CDK, AWS CloudFormation, SST, Serverless framework, Terraform, and AWS SAM. There are others, but when talking about Infrastructure as Code (IaC), these are the ones you hear about most often.

1 - Serverless + AWS CDK + Lift: An integration that amps up the traditional Serverless Framework with Lift's static frontend construct and CDK's robust infra definition.

It's a bit easier in Python if you use tools like https://www.serverless.com/. I'm not sure if Rust has something similar yet.

Serverless

Hey! I was in the same place as you are, and the best solution I found was to use Mangum (https://mangum.io/). I believe it also works with Django. Mangum is an adapter that transforms lambda events into the corresponding structure to be received by your Framework API endpoints. We are currently using it with FastAPI and it's great. We code our backend without thinking about whether it will run on Lambda, and Magum takes care of the rest.

In the real world I'm never using static cloud resources. It's all serverless, containers, or horizontal auto-scaling. I let the infrastructure handle asynchronous scaling when needed. For FastAPI specifically I've used Mangum: https://mangum.io/ to provide the asynchronous invocation below the ASGI layer. Then all my FastAPI code can just be synchronous.

I discovered https://github.com/jordaneremieff/mangum which basically transforms a fastapi app to be compatible with aws lambda.

Should I create only 1 apigtw resource with 1 lambda and use mangum + fastapi for my rest api ?

Mangum: For the integration of the Aws Lambda and the Api Gateway with the FastApi

If you go the lambda route, you can use DRF (or any ASGI app) using https://mangum.io/

Yes, it's possible to wrap any asgi app to run in a lambda. Check out Mangum https://github.com/jordaneremieff/mangum

But we do not have a handler function, do we? We have a Mangum object wrapping the FastAPI application. Luckily, the Mangum object acts as a handler function, so we can just add the following in example/src/app/__init__.py:

I've used fastapi in a lambda. The package Mangum simplifies the conversion of lambda handler to a more tradition request.