sent_debias VS fairlearn

following on from the above, to what extent should we trust big models and the built in biases that they learn from huge scraped datasets? Many current SOTA trends for doing few shot learning on nlp tasks involve fine tuning existing large language models. There are lots of interesting research is going on around understanding and removing these biases like this paper from Liang and Li @ ACL2020. A related point is explainability - again some interesting work going on around things like rationale generation this now somewhat old paper by Lei et al 2016 gives some good context

I'm involved in the Fairlearn project, and we always love getting new contributors. We have a bunch of open issues, ranging from new functionality to writing documentation, so feel free to take a look and see if there is something you would like to work on.

I'm involved with the Fairlearn project, so once I figure out what's necessary from a company policy-side, my plan is to incorporate these methods into Fairlearn one day.

Besides the existing monitoring solution mentioned in the section above, we were also took inspiration from continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) testing tools like Jenkins and Circle CI, on the engineering front, and existing fairness libraries like Microsoft's Fairlearn and IMB's Fairness 360, on the machine learning side of things.

Another commenter mentioned contributing to open-source tools. If you're interested in going that route, I'm involved in the Fairlearn project, and we could always benefit from a good data engineer.