semantic-source
typescript-language-server
semantic-source | typescript-language-server | |
---|---|---|
23 | 53 | |
8,862 | 1,705 | |
0.2% | 2.4% | |
9.1 | 8.7 | |
about 1 month ago | 4 days ago | |
Haskell | TypeScript | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
semantic-source
-
The Meaning of Monad in MonadTrans
One production example I know: GitHub code navigation is written in Haskell https://github.com/github/semantic
- Semantic: Parsing, analyzing, and comparing source code across many languages
-
How to Get Started with Tree-Sitter
ah, easy. it's because support has not been added into https://github.com/github/semantic which is the tech that powers the GitHub UI. Adding support is pretty easy/mainly glue code [1] that imports the tree sitter API.
[1] https://github.com/github/semantic/blob/793a876ae45d38a6bd17...
- Scala community now has control over the official Scala grammar for tree-sitter 🎉
- 2022 State of Haskell Survey
-
11 Companies That Use Haskell in Production
GitHub used Haskell for implementing Semantic, a command-line tool for parsing, analyzing, and comparing source code.
-
What happened with GitHub's semantic project?
As far as engineering effort, you can read this GitHub comment for an overview of where we’d like to take the project in the future. The tl;dr here is that the open sum type view of the world made it very concise to fold over syntax trees (since such a view of data is ultimately unityped, recursion schemes Just Work), but the tradeoff thus associated—namely, that you have to parse a concrete syntax tree into an open-sum view (a complicated and painful-to-read process), that you can never really be sure how a given syntax tree is shaped, and that the types don’t help you nearly as much as they could—proved to be too onerous to deal with. Going forward, we’re generating syntax types from the AST once per target language, and working on an abstraction (probably via this generated code; I made five separate efforts at using Generics for this, and failed every time) that recovers at least some of the convenience of recursion schemes. It turns out that recursion schemes over a mutually recursive syntax tree—as pretty much every language’s syntax trees are, in practice—are pretty much an unsolved problem, especially when extended to languages like TypeScript, which have hundreds of different syntax nodes.
-
Stack Graphs
Meanwhile their Tree-Sitter-based semantic parser[1] looks abandoned. There is even rotting for years pull request[2] adding support of the same stack graphs into it.
[1] https://github.com/github/semantic
[2] https://github.com/github/semantic/pull/535
-
Cardano relying on Haskell is not bad at all
The semantic team at GitHub uses it for statically analyzing the dozens of languages that end up in GitHub repositories: https://github.com/github/semantic/blob/eaf13783838861fe5eb6cd46d59354774a8eb88d/docs/why-haskell.md
-
7 Useful Tools Written in Haskell
Yesterday I was looking for some examples of projects using tree-sitter (which is C) when I found GitHub's semantic, used to analyze and compare source code, and written in Haskell: https://github.com/github/semantic/
typescript-language-server
- Helix - Front-End Power
-
What is JSDoc and why you may not need typescript for your next project?
Besides the features TypeScript itself proposed, the most important thing it brought to the community was the ability to create cool features around this compiler that enhance the developer experience and productivity. Tools like tsserver, pretty ts errors, and many others are actively improving the ecosystem for both JavaScript and TypeScript writers.
-
A guide on Neovim's LSP client
Sometimes a language server can support multiple filetypes. An example of this is tsserver, the language server for javascript and typescript. In this case a filetype plugin can still work but there is an easier way to go about it.
-
Suspense your federated component with caution
in this way the ts server can detect and parse the component from the microfronent, thanks to monorepos!
-
Let's write an Emacs treesitter major mode
That was interesting, thanks for pointing it out
I was tremendously sad to see that the Typescript Language Server wasn't owned by Microsoft <https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/impleme...>, since if there was any sanity in the world a spec bump would travel with a reference implementation showing how they envision such a thing being used
But, I found that the Typescript Language Server that they did list does indeed have a semantic-tokens module in it, although it's much shorter than I would have expected from reading that section in the spec: https://github.com/typescript-language-server/typescript-lan...
-
How do I select which LSP is currently running?
I would like to use svelte language server when working on +page.server.ts files and not the typescript language server.
-
Formatting on save not working
[[language]] name = "python" roots = ["pyproject.toml"] formatter = { command = "black", args = ["--quiet", "-"] } language-server = { command = "pyright-langserver", args = ["--stdio"] } config = {} auto-format = true [[language]] name = "rust" auto-format = true # [[language]] # name = "typescript" # auto-format = true # formatter = { command = "prettier", args = ["--parser", "typescript"]} # # pass format options according to https://github.com/typescript-language-server/typescript-language-server#workspacedidchangeconfiguration omitting the "[language].format." prefix. # config = { format = { "semicolons" = "insert", "insertSpaceBeforeFunctionParenthesis" = true } } [[language]] name = "tsx" formatter = { command = 'prettier', args = ["--parser", "typescript"] } auto-format = true [[language]] name = "javascript" auto-format = true formatter = { command = 'npx', args = ["prettier", "--config", ".prettierrc", "--parser", "javascript"] } # formatter = { command = "prettier", args = ["--parser", "javascript"]} [[language]] name = "css" formatter = { command = 'prettier', args = ["--parser", "css"] } [[language]] name = "markdown" # https://github.com/executablebooks/mdformat formatter = { command = "mdformat", args = ["-"] } [[language]] name = "json" formatter = { command = "prettier", args = ["--parser", "json"] } [[language]] name = "toml" auto-format = true # https://github.com/bd82/toml-tools/tree/master/packages/prettier-plugin-toml formatter = { command = "prettier", args = ["--parser", "toml"] } [[language]] name = "yaml" indent = { tab-width = 2, unit = " " } formatter = { command = "prettier", args = ["--parser", "yaml"] } [[language]] name = "astro" scope = "source.astro" injection-regex = "astro" file-types = ["astro"] roots = ["package.json", "astro.config.mjs"] language-server = { command = "astro-ls", args = ["--stdio"] } config = { "typescript" = { serverPath = "/Users/matteostara/.nvm/versions/node/v18.16.0/bin/typescript-language-server" }, "environment" = "node" }
-
Struggling with javascript completion with LSP
Depending on the language server version, you may be running into https://github.com/typescript-language-server/typescript-language-server/issues/631. I temporarily fixed it for me by simply sticking with an old enough server build, though judging by the latest typescript-language-server commits a very recent build from master should also work
-
There's another typescript LSP that wraps the official VSCode typescript extension and has almost the same features - vtsls
Before, I was using typescript-language-server as it is LSP compliant but it was slow and lacks the features of what VSCode's implementation has, like extracting functions, constants, types into interfaces or alias and single imports. Auto-completion was also not very predictive as sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't. For instance, I was having trouble getting it to auto-complete common attributes like className or href in JSX projects. It could be that I may be doing something wrong but didn't find any solution on how to get it properly working.
-
What could cause my LSP to be so slow and sluggish? Takes anywhere from 1 to 8 seconds to show auto-completion results and hide/ unhide errors.
Then this is highly likely issue of typescript-language-server. You might consider opening an issue for it.
What are some alternatives?
diffsitter - A tree-sitter based AST difftool to get meaningful semantic diffs
deno - A modern runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript.
massiv - Efficient Haskell Arrays featuring Parallel computation
nvim-lspconfig - Quickstart configs for Nvim LSP
refined - Refinement types with static checking
null-ls.nvim - Use Neovim as a language server to inject LSP diagnostics, code actions, and more via Lua.
cantor-pairing - Convert data to and from a natural number representation
nvim-lsp-ts-utils - Utilities to improve the TypeScript development experience for Neovim's built-in LSP client.
jump - Jump start your Haskell development
nvim-lspinstall - Provides the missing :LspInstall for nvim-lspconfig
Glean - System for collecting, deriving and working with facts about source code.
TypeScript - IO wrapper around TypeScript language services, allowing for easy consumption by editor plugins