self-hosted
openobserve
self-hosted | openobserve | |
---|---|---|
29 | 38 | |
7,284 | 9,437 | |
1.5% | 5.6% | |
9.1 | 9.9 | |
7 days ago | 7 days ago | |
Shell | Rust | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
self-hosted
-
Pydantic Logfire
I was responding to the One of the Sentry inconvenience is self-hosting: it relies on so many services it can be very complicated to maintain part, and also reminding readers that if they, too, hate companies that rug-pull their open source licenses, there is a band-aid for both parts
Compare https://github.com/getsentry/self-hosted/blob/9.1.2/docker-c... with https://github.com/getsentry/self-hosted/blob/24.4.2/docker-... for what life used to be like for running Sentry on-prem. It was awesome
It would take a ton of work to dig up the actual memory and CPU requirements of each one, but rest assured they're not zero, so every one of those services eats ram and requires TLC when, not if, they shit themselves. So, more parts == more headaches with all other things being equal
Then, I deeply appreciate that there are a whole spectrum of reactions to the various licensing schemes in use nowadays, and a bunch of folks don't care. I care, though, because I have gotten immense value from open source projects, and have contributed changes back to quite a few. It has been my life experience that any of those "source available" licenses usually are very hostile toward making local builds and if I can't build it to match how prod goes, then I can't test my fixes in my environment and then I can't contribute the PR with any faith
-
Sentry new TOS to use data to train AI with no opt-out
This is the point where I will point out that you can self-host Sentry free of charge :) https://develop.sentry.dev/self-hosted/
-
Low cost self-hosted bug reporting?
Sentry can be self hosted: https://develop.sentry.dev/self-hosted/
-
FSL: A License for the Bazaar, Not the Cathedral
The people we're concerned about are not the hundreds of thousands of Sentry users, including those that self-host.
We're concerned about people who have taken the software for the purposes of competing directly against us, that hinders our ability to monetize the work. Monetizing the work helps us continue improving the software and distribute it for free use, benefitting those aforementioned real users (e.g. https://github.com/getsentry/self-hosted).
-
Show HN: A open-source financial accounting alternative to QuickBooks
> I mean no slander or disrespect to anyone involved, but there was a DataDog alternative posted sometime in the last few weeks that had a docker-compose with like 15 containers in it.
Reminds me of Sentry: https://develop.sentry.dev/self-hosted/
This is their example docker-compose for self-hosting: https://github.com/getsentry/self-hosted/blob/master/docker-...
It has:
- exim4 (smtp)
-
OpenTelemetry in 2023
> What should people use?
I recall Apache Skywalking being pretty good, especially for smaller/medium scale projects: https://skywalking.apache.org/
The architecture is simple, the performance is adequate, it doesn't make you spend days configuring it and it even supports various different data stores: https://skywalking.apache.org/docs/main/v9.0.0/en/setup/back...
The problems with it are that it isn't super popular (although has agents for most popular stacks), the docs could be slightly better and I recall them also working on a new UI so there is a little bit of churn: https://skywalking.apache.org/downloads/
Still better versus some of the other options when you need something that just works instead of spending a lot of time configuring something (even when that something might be superior in regards to the features): https://github.com/getsentry/self-hosted/blob/master/docker-...
Sentry is just the first thing that comes to mind (OpenTelemetry also isn't simpler due to how much it tries to do), but compare its complexity to Skywalking: https://github.com/apache/skywalking/blob/master/docker/dock...
I wish there was more self-hosted software like that out there, enough to address certain concerns in a simple way on day 1 and leave branching out to more complex options like OpenTelemetry once you have a separate team for that and the cash is rolling in.
- Why use application stacks script installers
-
OpenObserve: Elasticsearch/Datadog alternative in Rust.. 140x lower storage cost
Sounds interesting!
Will you compare with qryn? Self-hosted sentry?
qryn.metrico.in/
https://develop.sentry.dev/self-hosted/
-
Insufficient logging
I haven't done it in years, but technically sentry is able to be self hosted https://github.com/getsentry/self-hosted
- Cloud Native Alternative to Sentry?
openobserve
-
Show HN: OneUptime β open-source Datadog Alternative
Lot of interesting OSS observability products coming out in recent years. One of the more impressive(and curious for many reasons) IMHO is OpenObserve: https://github.com/openobserve/openobserve .
As opposed to just a stack, they are implementing just about the whole backend shebang from scratch.
-
Indexing one petabyte of logs per day with Quickwit
in case it matters to others, https://github.com/openobserve/openobserve/tree/v0.7.0 is the last Apache2 licensed copy before they went AGPL with 0.7.1
https://github.com/openobserve/openobserve/blob/v0.7.0/.env.... is some "onoz" for me, but just recently someone submitted https://github.com/aenix-io/etcd-operator to the CNCF sandbox so maybe things have gotten better around keeping that PoS alive
-
Apache Superset
eCharts is awesome. We moved from plotly after using it for several months to echarts at https://github.com/openobserve/openobserve and are super happy.
-
Logdy.dev β web based logs viewer UI for local development environment
Wouldn't make more sense to have the same observability stack on production and development? For instance, open-observe is also a single binary that provides UI for logs, metrics and traces, although every log producer would have to be properly configured and routing to it.
Another idea: maybe chrome dev-tools could be repurposed to display server logs instead of client logs, somehow [2].
--
1: https://github.com/openobserve/openobserve
2: https://chromedevtools.github.io/devtools-protocol/
-
Did OpenTelemetry deliver on its promise in 2023?
It doesn't read from files unfortunately, but https://openobserve.ai/ is very easy to set up locally (single binary) and send otel logs/metrics/traces to.
Here's how I run it locally for my little shovel project - https://github.com/bbkane/shovel#run-the-webapp-locally-with... .
Also linked from that README is an Ansible playbook to start OpenObserve as a systems service on a Linux VM.
Alternatively, see the shovel codebase I linked above for a "stdout" TracerProvider. You could do something like that to save to a file, and then use a tool to prettify the JSON. I have a small script to format json logs at https://github.com/bbkane/dotfiles/blob/2df9af5a9bbb40f2e101...
-
Everything is working :(
Implement a monitoring stack, or openobserve for an all-in-one package.
-
Windows alternative to Graylog?
I would recommend you take a look at OpenObserve (https://github.com/openobserve/openobserve ). It's free and open source and can do all you asked and more with far lower resource utilization. It's the easiest to run of any log system that you can find. Can capture windows and linux logs. Also compresses them heavily (30-60x, YMMV). 100 GB ingested logs can be 3 GB stored.
- Show HN: Monitor your webapp with minimal setup
-
ΞΌMon: Stupid simple monitoring
I have used https://github.com/openobserve/openobserve in several hobby projects and liked it. It's an all-in-one solution. It's likely less featureful than many others but a single binary and everything in one place pulled me in and worked for me so far.
Not affiliated, I just like the tool.
-
Show HN: HyperDX β open-source dev-friendly Datadog alternative
A good one. A lot is being built on top of clickhouse. I can count at least 3 if not more (hyperdx, signoz and highlight) built on top of clickhouse now.
We at OpenObserve are solving the same problem but a bit differently. A much simpler solution that anyone can run using a single binary on their own laptop or in a cluster of hundreds of nodes backed by s3. Covers logs, metrics, traces, Session replay, RUM and error tracking are being released by end of the month) - https://github.com/openobserve/openobserve
What are some alternatives?
Sentry - Developer-first error tracking and performance monitoring
graylog - Free and open log management
Code-Server - VS Code in the browser
quickwit - Cloud-native search engine for observability. An open-source alternative to Datadog, Elasticsearch, Loki, and Tempo.
apprise - Apprise - Push Notifications that work with just about every platform!
hyperdx - Resolve production issues, fast. An open source observability platform unifying session replays, logs, metrics, traces and errors powered by Clickhouse and OpenTelemetry.
zammad-docker-compose - Zammad Docker images for docker-compose
loki - Like Prometheus, but for logs.
ML-Workspace - π All-in-one web-based IDE specialized for machine learning and data science.
parseable - Parseable is a log analytics system platform for modern, cloud native workloads
JupyterLab - JupyterLab computational environment.
Collectd - The system statistics collection daemon. Please send Pull Requests here!