secure-electron-template
Task
secure-electron-template | Task | |
---|---|---|
7 | 113 | |
1,609 | 10,173 | |
- | 3.2% | |
3.7 | 9.6 | |
about 1 month ago | 1 day ago | |
JavaScript | Go | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
secure-electron-template
- oauth code flow en aplicaciones de escritorio
-
Shrugs.app – A native Slack client for macOS
That's a common refrain I hear that Electron apps aren't secure. It was more true in the past and less-so now. I've been maintaining a secure Electron template for 2 years that's got traction in the community, if you are interested - https://github.com/reZach/secure-electron-template.
-
What is the purpose of whitelisting channels in preload.js rather than just having all the functions in there?
You'd specify the valid IPC channels in preload.js, and as long as you don't create a "getSuperSecretInfo" channel that responds with sensitive data, a malicious script in the renderer process won't have access to said data. This writeup may answer some of your questions: https://github.com/reZach/secure-electron-template/blob/master/docs/secureapps.md
-
An Electron app architecture
Started from secure-electron-template
- Ask HN: What are some tools / libraries you built yourself?
- State of Electron frameworks [May 2021]
- State of Electron frameworks – May 2021
Task
-
Show HN: Workflow Orchestrator in Golang
So many tools in this space! This one looks a little bit like go-task, but it seems maybe better for production workflows because if timeout support, while go-task seems more aimed to command line work/makefile replacement.
—-
https://github.com/go-task/task
-
Essential Command Line Tools for Developers
View on GitHub
- Task: A task runner / alternative to GNU Make
-
Using Make – writing less Makefile
A similar tool is `task` https://taskfile.dev/ . It is quite capable and also a single executable. I've grown to quite like it.
-
What’s with DevOps engineers using `make` of all things?
check out tasks - a bit of a learning curve but arguably more powerful imo
-
Go Development with Hot Reload Using Taskfile
That's when I came across taskfile.dev. Task is an automation tool designed to be more accessible than other options, such as GNU Make.
-
Poetry (Packaging) in motion
Full disclosure, I did not review Conda or Hatch fully. Not that there is anything explicitly wrong with either of them. Conda is too specific to the scientific community for my general taste. Hatch seems to go well with Conda and also uses the PyProject manifest as well. It's nice that it gives you several built in tools, similar to commit hooks, but I tend to like to roll my own via a Taskfile and run them with Poetry.
-
Building RESTful API with Hexagonal Architecture in Go
Taskfile is a tool for streamlining repetitive development tasks. It helps automate activities like building, testing, and deploying applications. Unlike Makefile, Taskfile uses YAML for configuration, making it more readable and user-friendly.
-
We built the fastest CI in the world. It failed
9. We test everything with another promotion which runs make targets which build docker containers to run python scripts (pytest)
This is also built by a complicated web of wildcarded makefile targets, which need to be interoperable and support a few if/else cases for specific components.
My plan is to migrate all of this to something simpler and more straightforward, or at least more maintainable, which is honestly probably going to turn into taskfile[0] instead of makefiles, and then simple python scripts for the glue that ties everything together or does more complex logic.
My hope is that it can be more straightforward and easier to maintain, with more component-ized logic, but realistically every step in that labyrinthine build process (and that's just the open-source version!) came from a decision made by a very talented team of engineers who know far more about the process and the product than I do. At this point I'm wondering if it would make 'more sense' to replace it with a giant python script of some kind and get access to all the logic we need all at once (it would not).
[0] https://taskfile.dev/
-
Exploring GCP With Terraform: Setting Up The Environment And Project
task - a task runner and a replacement for make
What are some alternatives?
htmx - </> htmx - high power tools for HTML
just - 🤖 Just a command runner
re-start - react-native template to target multiple platforms :globe_with_meridians: :iphone: :computer: with single codebase.
doit - task management & automation tool
Pion WebRTC - Pure Go implementation of the WebRTC API
goreleaser - Deliver Go binaries as fast and easily as possible
electron-boilerplate - Boilerplate to kickstart creating an app with Electron
boilr - :zap: boilerplate template manager that generates files or directories from template repositories
GoJS, a JavaScript Library for HTML Diagrams - JavaScript diagramming library for interactive flowcharts, org charts, design tools, planning tools, visual languages.
JobRunner - Framework for performing work asynchronously, outside of the request flow
lowdefy - The config web stack for business apps - build internal tools, client portals, web apps, admin panels, dashboards, web sites, and CRUD apps with YAML or JSON.
taskctl - Concurrent task runner, developer's routine tasks automation toolkit. Simple modern alternative to GNU Make 🧰