search-benchmark-game
Typesense
search-benchmark-game | Typesense | |
---|---|---|
5 | 130 | |
66 | 17,965 | |
- | 2.7% | |
6.7 | 9.8 | |
3 months ago | 7 days ago | |
Rust | C++ | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
search-benchmark-game
-
Infino - Fast and scalable service to store time series and logs - written in Rust
Also, we have a benchmark for search. Feel free to add your engine. I believe it is fair: we are not leading the leaderboard, the rules are fairly clear, and no one has contested them so far. https://github.com/quickwit-oss/search-benchmark-game/
-
tantivy 0.19 is released: IP field type, Faster indexing, Configurable doc store compression, Improved aggregation support, and more...
Could you update the benchmark? It still uses tantivity 0.16.
-
An alternative to Elasticsearch that runs on a few MBs of RAM
This is very very difficult, but Tantivy tried: see https://github.com/quickwit-oss/search-benchmark-game
-
Why Is C Faster Than Java (2009)
That's just because there's no a lucene equivalent C library with the same level of attention?
however, there are increasingly such written in C++ (pisa) and rust (tantivy). They handily beat lucene in benchmark suites [1] - so it seems like lucene does suffer from a java penalty - despite getting even more developer attention than pisa and tantivy I would think.
1: https://tantivy-search.github.io/bench/
-
Tantivy v0.15 released! Now backed by Quickwit Inc.!
The benchmark is open sourced here: https://github.com/tantivy-search/search-benchmark-game
Typesense
-
Website Search Hurts My Feelings
There are actually plenty of non-ES products that are way easier to integrate and tune (and get better results with less effort).
- Typesense (https://github.com/typesense/typesense)
- Algolia
- Google Programmable Search Engine (https://programmablesearchengine.google.com/about/)
- Remote Machine Learning and Searching on a Raspberry Pi 5
-
Open Source alternatives to tools you Pay for
Typesense - Open Source Alternative to Algolia
-
DNS record "hn.algolia.com" is gone
If you like your penny take a look at Typesense https://typesense.org/ - nothing to complain here. Especially nothing complain about pricing.
-
Vector databases: analyzing the trade-offs
I work on Typesense [1] (historically considered an open source alternative to Algolia).
We then launched vector search in Jan 2023, and just last week we launched the ability to generate embeddings from within Typesense.
You'd just need to send JSON data, and Typesense can generate embeddings for your data using OpenAI, PaLM API, or built-in models like S-BERT, E-5, etc (running on a GPU if you prefer) [2]
You can then do a hybrid (keyword + semantic) search by just sending the search keywords to Typesense, and Typesense will automatically generate embeddings for you internally and return a ranked list of keyword results weaved with semantic results (using Rank Fusion).
You can also combine filtering, faceting, typo tolerance, etc - the things Typesense already had.
[1] https://github.com/typesense/typesense
[2] https://typesense.org/docs/0.25.0/api/vector-search.html
-
Creating an advanced search engine with PostgreSQL
For something small with a minimal footprint, I'd recommend Typesense. https://github.com/typesense/typesense
-
Obsidian Publish full text search
I haven’t used Publish, but I’d assume you could use something like https://typesense.org/ to index and search the vault.
-
DynamoDB search options
A cheaper option would be to use https://typesense.org. You can use DynamoDb streams to automatically load records. It has worked well for me.
-
[Guide] A Tour Through the Python Framework Galaxy: Discovering the Stars
Try tigris | typesense for faster search
-
Is it worth using Postgres' builtin full-text search or should I go straight to Elastic?
I’m also checking out Typesense as a possibility for replacing Elastic: https://typesense.org/
What are some alternatives?
tantivy-wasm
MeiliSearch - A lightning-fast search API that fits effortlessly into your apps, websites, and workflow
proposal-explicit-resource-managemen
Elasticsearch - Free and Open, Distributed, RESTful Search Engine
Nim - Nim is a statically typed compiled systems programming language. It combines successful concepts from mature languages like Python, Ada and Modula. Its design focuses on efficiency, expressiveness, and elegance (in that order of priority).
Apache Solr - Apache Lucene and Solr open-source search software
librope - UTF-8 rope library for C
meilisearch-laravel-scout - MeiliSearch integration for Laravel Scout
tantivy - Tantivy is a full-text search engine library inspired by Apache Lucene and written in Rust [Moved to: https://github.com/quickwit-oss/tantivy]
loki - Like Prometheus, but for logs.
distributed-wikipedia-mirror - Putting Wikipedia Snapshots on IPFS
sonic - 🦔 Fast, lightweight & schema-less search backend. An alternative to Elasticsearch that runs on a few MBs of RAM.