sd
Task
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
sd
-
Essential Command Line Tools for Developers
View on GitHub
-
Ripgrep 14 Released
I wanted to like sd but it doesn't support my main use case of recursive search/replace. Imagine every time you wanted to grep some files you had to build a find+xargs+rg pipeline... it just takes me out of the flow too much. I'm glad people are posting other options here, I'm looking forward to trying them.
https://github.com/chmln/sd/issues/62
-
🐚🦀Comandos shell reescritos em Rust
sd
-
sed cheatsheet
https://github.com/chmln/sd ftw (sed rebuilt in rust, much easier imho) ;-)
-
What modern utilities should be a standard part of a modern unixy distro?
sd is a more intuitive alternative to sed, focussing on making find and replace easier - which is all I ever used sed for.
https://github.com/chmln/sd
-
Delete all occurrences of a string
If it's in multiple files? To be honest, I'd just use a terminal and sed (or sd if you want something with a more friendly interface).
- Neovim locks up on big files while doing a replacement
-
sd: your script directory
I love the idea and I'll try it out, but a heads up in case the author is around: the name sd clashes with another tool [0], which works as an alternative to sed.
I use that one pretty often, so maybe my first managed script will be one which symlinks binaries :)
[0] https://github.com/chmln/sd
- Intuitive find and replace CLI (sed alternative)
-
Rust Easy! Modern Cross-platform Command Line Tools to Supercharge Your Terminal
sd is a find-and-replace CLI, and you can use it as a replacement for sed and awk. It is way more user-friendly and modern. It is also magnitudes faster than sed.
Task
-
Show HN: Workflow Orchestrator in Golang
So many tools in this space! This one looks a little bit like go-task, but it seems maybe better for production workflows because if timeout support, while go-task seems more aimed to command line work/makefile replacement.
—-
https://github.com/go-task/task
-
Essential Command Line Tools for Developers
View on GitHub
- Task: A task runner / alternative to GNU Make
-
Using Make – writing less Makefile
A similar tool is `task` https://taskfile.dev/ . It is quite capable and also a single executable. I've grown to quite like it.
-
What’s with DevOps engineers using `make` of all things?
check out tasks - a bit of a learning curve but arguably more powerful imo
-
Go Development with Hot Reload Using Taskfile
That's when I came across taskfile.dev. Task is an automation tool designed to be more accessible than other options, such as GNU Make.
-
Poetry (Packaging) in motion
Full disclosure, I did not review Conda or Hatch fully. Not that there is anything explicitly wrong with either of them. Conda is too specific to the scientific community for my general taste. Hatch seems to go well with Conda and also uses the PyProject manifest as well. It's nice that it gives you several built in tools, similar to commit hooks, but I tend to like to roll my own via a Taskfile and run them with Poetry.
-
Building RESTful API with Hexagonal Architecture in Go
Taskfile is a tool for streamlining repetitive development tasks. It helps automate activities like building, testing, and deploying applications. Unlike Makefile, Taskfile uses YAML for configuration, making it more readable and user-friendly.
-
We built the fastest CI in the world. It failed
9. We test everything with another promotion which runs make targets which build docker containers to run python scripts (pytest)
This is also built by a complicated web of wildcarded makefile targets, which need to be interoperable and support a few if/else cases for specific components.
My plan is to migrate all of this to something simpler and more straightforward, or at least more maintainable, which is honestly probably going to turn into taskfile[0] instead of makefiles, and then simple python scripts for the glue that ties everything together or does more complex logic.
My hope is that it can be more straightforward and easier to maintain, with more component-ized logic, but realistically every step in that labyrinthine build process (and that's just the open-source version!) came from a decision made by a very talented team of engineers who know far more about the process and the product than I do. At this point I'm wondering if it would make 'more sense' to replace it with a giant python script of some kind and get access to all the logic we need all at once (it would not).
[0] https://taskfile.dev/
-
Exploring GCP With Terraform: Setting Up The Environment And Project
task - a task runner and a replacement for make
What are some alternatives?
ripgrep - ripgrep recursively searches directories for a regex pattern while respecting your gitignore
just - 🤖 Just a command runner
neomutt - ✉️ Teaching an Old Dog New Tricks -- IRC: #neomutt on irc.libera.chat
doit - task management & automation tool
useful-sed - Useful sed scripts & patterns.
goreleaser - Deliver Go binaries as fast and easily as possible
hck - A sharp cut(1) clone.
boilr - :zap: boilerplate template manager that generates files or directories from template repositories
pomsky - A new, portable, regular expression language
JobRunner - Framework for performing work asynchronously, outside of the request flow
joshuto - ranger-like terminal file manager written in Rust
taskctl - Concurrent task runner, developer's routine tasks automation toolkit. Simple modern alternative to GNU Make 🧰