scrapeghost VS zoxide

Not my project but an ex-colleague has been having some success in this direction: https://jamesturk.github.io/scrapeghost/

Yes, there is something like that available - ScrapeGhost.

With AI scraping, tools can be far more resilient than soon enough to minor dom changes. See - https://jamesturk.github.io/scrapeghost/.

Their ToS mentions scraping but it pertains to scraping their frontend instead of using their API, which they don't want you to do.

Also - this library requests the HTML by itself [0] and ships it as a prompt but with preset system messages as the instruction [1].

[0] - https://github.com/jamesturk/scrapeghost/blob/main/src/scrap...

[1] - https://github.com/jamesturk/scrapeghost/blob/main/src/scrap...

Head over to ajeetdsouza/zoxide and install it now! It's innovative, free, and flexible!

I use this Rust clone which works great, no complaints: https://github.com/ajeetdsouza/zoxide

Although, I don't know what the difference is, other than the language of choice.

I use https://github.com/ajeetdsouza/zoxide, which is inspired by z and autojump.

Zoxide is basically the 'Rust Rewrite' version of the 'Z' tool and is actively maintained, I haven't had any issues with it: https://github.com/ajeetdsouza/zoxide

Indeed, utilities like zoxide which operate primarily as a cd replacement don't attempt to change directories via rust code - they create a shell alias that ultimately invokes a shell builtin to do it.

I also still use zoxide for navigating directories. It's a smarter cd command that learns your habits and makes navigating directories a breeze.

4. Zoxide

Not sure what you mean by bookmarks, but I use zoxide to quickly jump to frequently used folders.