spec
uuid6-ietf-draft
| spec | uuid6-ietf-draft | |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | 7 | |
| 7,630 | 182 | |
| 0.2% | 1.1% | |
| 6.2 | 5.7 | |
| 4 months ago | 6 months ago | |
| HTML | ||
| Apache License 2.0 | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
spec
-
What's the status of Open Application Model?
There was recently score.dev, but that is also just used by one tool.
- One YAML to rule them all
-
Best events/conferences to participate for an open-source project?
Yesterday I was thinking about the roadmap and the discussions that are happening in the community (you can check them here and feel free to open one or contribute to an active one) and I am excited to see how much we have to look forward in 2023.
-
Thoughts on my new OSS tool launch + twitter space happening today
A month ago we open sourced Score. The community response has been really great so far (just over 1k stars in 4 weeks) and we got many questions thrown at us:
-
One YAML to rule them all!
Hi all, I am Giulia, Community Manager and part of the team that launched Score.dev a week ago. My team and I believe that developers shouldn’t fight with tooling and advocate for a workload-centric approach to development. We’re on a mission to reduce cognitive load on developers, minimize configuration drift and mismanagement, and improve the developer experience. Want to join us as a contributor? Read the official announcement to learn more. Or check us out on GitHub!
- One YAML to rule them all. We just open sourced a new workload config spec so you can configure once and deploy to any environment (local, cloud, etc.)
-
The pros and cons of managing configuration for multiple environments
Last week we released score-spec and I asked a few communities for feedback on how you manage configuration between multiple environments and a lot of you (thanks!) came up with some answers and more questions. Here I wanted to list the pros and cons, in my humble opinion, of the top approaches suggested. Feel free to add yours as well!
- Trouble with consistent config across environments?
uuid6-ietf-draft
-
The UX of UUIDs
https://github.com/uuid6/uuid6-ietf-draft/issues/27
-
This is very cool! I love this solution for ID’s what do you all think?
Why not UUIDv7?
-
UUIDs Are Bad for Database Index Performance, enter UUID7!
What if a new UUID version could be designed that would take the randomness of UUID4 and combine it with a timestamp prefix? This would make the UUID increase overall, but not locally – due to the random postfix. The random part ensures uniqueness when a high generation rate is necessary and also makes the UUIDs hard to predict – it’s not possible to guess the previous, or next UUID. It’s fairly simple to devise a custom UUID scheme, but fortunately, there is a new Internet-Draft (at the time of writing) defining new pseudo-sequential UUID versions that aim to solve exactly this issue: draft-peabody-dispatch-new-uuid-format-04. The current state and progress can be viewed at IETF Datatracker.
-
Understanding UUIDs, ULIDs and String Representations
Brad Peabody did the original -00 draft, which was discussed as an FYI at an IEFT meeting in March 2020. See [1], around 50 lines from the bottom.
Kyzer Davis has since submitted two further revisions -01 and -02 in April and October 2021. See history in [2].
The current -02 draft is due to expire in April 2022. Presumably Kyzer Davis will try to get it discussed before then.
The GitHub repo tracking these drafts is https://github.com/uuid6/uuid6-ietf-draft/.
[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/107/materials/minutes-1...
[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peabody-dispatch-new-...
- UUID version 7. It's binary sortable and has many other advantages. Created specifically for modern distributed systems. IETF draft is published, they mid tweaking before publishing v3 draft.
-
New UUID Formats – IETF Draft
At the moment anyway, that XML link won't render per an XML parsing error. For anyone who wants a quick look at what these XML docs look like here's one for UUID6 [0].
[0] https://github.com/uuid6/uuid6-ietf-draft/blob/master/draft-...
What are some alternatives?
kuuid - K-sortable UUID - roughly time-sortable unique id generator
uuid7 - UUID version 7, which are time-sortable (following the Peabody RFC4122 draft)
ulid - Universally Unique Lexicographically Sortable Identifier (ULID) in Python 3
Ulid - Fast .NET C# Implementation of ULID for .NET and Unity.
dynamodb-onetable - DynamoDB access and management for one table designs with NodeJS
spec - The canonical spec for ulid
python-ksuid - A pure-Python KSUID implementation
ulid-mssql - Implementation of ULID generator For Microsoft SQL Server
ulid-lite - Generate unique, yet sortable identifiers
ksuid - K-Sortable Globally Unique IDs
simpleflake - Distributed ID generation in python for the lazy.
uulid.go - ULID-UUID compatibility library for generating and parsing ULIDs.