scholia VS citar

If it works out maybe it could be combined with Scholia, maybe that is a way to address the problem of the scatter unorganized noninteractive literature but it's doing that well right now. I made some proposals here that could be relevant to your project – for example this one: there could be a watchlist onto which you can put authors and small disciplines and then get recent changes shown on it; this way users could find new papers to review within their field and this could work across sites where one can comment on / review papers, including yours. As Scholia is so far not well-known and doesn't have this or similar features, maybe you could add a Watchlist for papers on your site and later enable it to also show papers from elsewhere.

If you're a researcher, I highly recommend citar.

If you have info on what you're looking for there, post 'em here.

I maintain citar and have had some questions (this is the recent one) about org-noter integration. Let us know if any input!

In fact this functionality already exists in the Citar package -- it's called citar-capf.

I recently decided to try switching to more built-in options such as the new built-in org-cite syntax. I am using the package citar for this (yes, I know org-ref can also be changed to use the new built-in syntax).

If you need citations, having Citar at your disposal is crazy nice.

Very very cool. Awesome to see so many authors using org-mode. Have you seen citar for finding and inserting citations?

OK, I just pushed a commit that allows one to configure that default function to leave the space out.

The citar package, which I created, has note integration packages available for both org-roam and denote (along with zk).