scenewriter VS simd

I wrote a thing in Rust, and got excited about being able to wasm-pack it and run it in a web frontend. In Firefox on my laptop it runs fast, it's like 2.5x slower in Chromium, which is still kinda OK. Then I tried it on my not-new-but-not-that-old tablet and IIRC it was something like 50x slower, which is not really OK.

Oh, I think I might've come across screenplain but been put off by "PDF will hopefully be supported in a not too distant future" in the README. The rest of the README suggests we're already in the not too distant future. I might not have bothered to write Farce if I'd known.

First Rust project, a fountain screenplay markup parser called Farce.

I'd love to see OpenCL or WasmSIMD support for RVV 071.

Wasm SIMD supports only 128-bit registers, no? https://github.com/WebAssembly/simd/blob/a78b98a6899c9e91a13095e560767af6e99d98fd/proposals/simd/SIMD.md

According to the WebAssembly Roadmap, the 128-bit packed SIMD Extension proposal has been accepted and is already implemented in every major runtime except Safari, and the Relaxed SIMD proposal is planned, with Firefox already having an experimental implementation in nightly-channel builds.

Thanks! You're probably right about spatial filtering with a low sphere count. SIMD is supported, that looks to work in every recent browser except Safari. Looking forward to trying that out. A really quick search of wasm-bindgen docs don't reveal an interface to use that SIMD support though. I wonder if you can unsafely inline some raw wasm like you can with asm!