s2n-quic
An implementation of the IETF QUIC protocol (by aws)
rfc8312bis
Revision of RFC8312 "CUBIC for Fast Long-Distance Networks" (by NTAP)
| s2n-quic | rfc8312bis | |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | 1 | |
| 1,066 | 13 | |
| 0.4% | - | |
| 9.3 | 0.0 | |
| 6 days ago | about 1 year ago | |
| Rust | C | |
| Apache License 2.0 | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
s2n-quic
Posts with mentions or reviews of s2n-quic.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-12-24.
- Boletín AWS Open Source, Christmas Edition
-
Kani 0.28.0 has been released!
Yes, the Kani CI time for s2n-quic dropped by more than 25% with Kani 0.28.
- Best performing quic implementation?
-
From Fuzzing to Proof: Using Kani with the Bolero Property-Testing Framework
Packet parsing is a great application for this type of testing. We've used bolero/Kani in a bunch of s2n-quic's codec implementations - example.
- S2n-QUIC (Rust implementation of QUIC)
-
Announcing s2n-quic 1.0
It's definitely a valid question, with there being a lot of great QUIC implementations out there. We do believe, though, s2n-quic has a lot to offer with a high level of security, testing, performance, and features. Given that s2n-quic will eventually be integrated into AWS Services, we ultimately need direct ownership of fundamental libraries like s2n-quic, s2n-tls, etc. to be able to maintain that high level of security and performance for our customers.
rfc8312bis
Posts with mentions or reviews of rfc8312bis.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-02-17.
-
S2n-QUIC (Rust implementation of QUIC)
CUBIC is a good baseline congestion controller. It's the default one that is being used in Linux, so it should provide adequate performance for a wide range of use-cases. Plus it's not so "olde" - the specification is actively improved (see https://github.com/NTAP/rfc8312bis), and the implementation of the algorithm inside s2n-quic even lead to the discovery of spec gaps that had been fixed as part of this effort.
Like most other QUIC libraries the congestion controller is also pluggable. So if a different one makes more sense for a particular use-case, it could be integrated in the future.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing s2n-quic and rfc8312bis you can also consider the following projects:
quinn - Async-friendly QUIC implementation in Rust
trident - Storage orchestrator for containers
quiche - 🥧 Savoury implementation of the QUIC transport protocol and HTTP/3
delight - A Spark UI and Spark History Server alternative with CPU and Memory metrics! Delight is free, cross-platform, and open-source.
tuic - Delicately-TUICed 0-RTT proxy protocol
neqo - Neqo, an implementation of QUIC in Rust
base-drafts - Internet-Drafts that make up the base QUIC specification
s2n - An implementation of the TLS/SSL protocols
rustls - A modern TLS library in Rust