rustyline VS anki

This latest release adds a Rustyline-based REPL and additional tools for using the filesystem as a relational database. The new init subcommand lets you declare the primary key by which a directory (and its subdirectories) are indexed, while ins and del now allow insertion and deletion of records while keeping related indices up to date. ls is helpful in the REPL, showing Ghee's view of the world.

That what gnu readline is good at, interpreter like interface. There is also this one https://github.com/kkawakam/rustyline

In the process of implementing Marwood's web REPL, I ported rust's [Rustyline](https://github.com/kkawakam/rustyline) readline library to an Xterm.js typescript addon called [xterm-readline](https://github.com/strtok/xterm-readline/).

There is rustyline, which is a readline implementation. It supports line editing in emacs or vi mode (selectable). I don't know if it can operate on two strings as input, but if your program takes input from a terminal, this could be what you are looking for.

Not sure if it will help in this case (docs always take effort to write and make good), but most crates have an examples directory in the root of their repo which can be helpful in the absence of guide-level docs https://github.com/kkawakam/rustyline/tree/master/examples

https://crates.io/crates/rustyline - readline clone in Rust

https://github.com/kkawakam/rustyline (literally, input a command)

Also based on popular demand, the REPL tool now uses a slightly enhanced version of rustyline for line editing and history.

it is also worth checking if library contains examples. this one does.

Maybe try reedline or rustyline and see if they meet your needs?

Try the Anki system…there was someone who learned over 10 languages with that method:

https://apps.ankiweb.net/

And here is the source code for Anki: https://github.com/ankitects/anki

If you want to convince people to use your spaced repetition software over Anki, you need to tell us what's so wrong with Anki that can't be fixed with plugins and that's worth $10 per year.

You must demonstrate value above what Anki does.

I look at your list of projects in https://0xdev.gumroad.com/ and they're all pre-order of things that already exist elsewhere. To me, this smacks of "give me money, and I'll give you promises." Especially the project https://0xdev.gumroad.com/l/HelpFundMe?layout=profile

You want something for free? I'll give you something for free.

Anki absolutely can be improved. For new users, it's very confusing: having multiple decks, the separation between cards and notes, and the search interface are hard for new users.

Combine something that is simpler for new users with a demonstrably better algorithm and you might have a minimally viable product. But you need the product FIRST before you request money.

Give us something that we can run for one week and know that it's better than the free software that is Anki.

This support landed late last year as part of https://github.com/ankitects/anki/releases/tag/23.10

> .apkg imports are able to merge changed notetypes, and can exclude scheduling data

My main use case is for managing my Azeron Cyborg profiles. And recently I have been experimenting with using the mobile controller feature to help do Anki spaced repetition reviews.

Anki Flashcards