crater
remarkable
Our great sponsors
crater | remarkable | |
---|---|---|
23 | 5 | |
610 | 5,667 | |
2.8% | - | |
7.8 | 3.9 | |
29 days ago | 5 months ago | |
Rust | JavaScript | |
- | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
crater
-
Semver violations are common, better tooling is the answer
yup, they reference it as an inspiration: https://github.com/rust-lang/crater
it's probably impossible to automate an entire ecosystem, and there is value to enabling a tighter integration within a project ecosystem (a subset of the language ecosystem).
-
Trip Summer ISO C++ standards meeting (Varna, Bulgaria)
Rather than hypothesising about an imagined tool you could look at the actual tool which of course is in Rust's source code repo: https://github.com/rust-lang/crater
> new proposed C++ changes - are checked against only easily and "well-known" accessible package.
Now that I have, so to say, shown you mine, lets see yours. Where is the tool to perform these checks in C++?
-
GCC 13 and the state of gccrs
The "break things" part of "move fast" is not essential, Rust cares so much about breakage they literally compile and run the tests for every crate on crates.io and github using a tool called Crater. They do this just to test changes, even for stuff thats documented to be unstable, because thats just courtesy. And tooling makes it trivial to switch between Rust versions.
-
Do one thing, and do it well, or not.
The bot's named Crater if you want to look into it more.
-
Improving Rust compile times to enable adoption of memory safety
See https://github.com/rust-lang/crater
-
Discussion about the state of neovim's plugin ecosystem
Rust compiler developers use a tool called Crater to test potentially breaking compiler changes on all crates (Rust's name for libraries) uploaded to the official repository. If plugin stability is the issue, maybe a solution along these lines would be better than merging these plugins to Neovim's core?
-
Experienced C++ users: what do you like about Rust? How would you sell it to other C++ users?
https://github.com/rust-lang/crater is the bot they use to test proposed compiler/stdlib changes against slices of the crates.io library up to and including "all of it".
-
Data-driven performance optimization with Rust and Miri
The tool you're referring to is called Crater: https://github.com/rust-lang/crater.
- GHC 9.4.2 regresses being able to do math on aarch64
-
Rust for Linux officially merged
I'm pretty certain this isn't actually true. You should look at the editions, etc. Rust also has an insane guarantee which I am certain C/C++ don't offer: It rebuilds its entire library ecosystem each time it ships to make sure nothing breaks (https://crater.rust-lang.org). I've never seen an instance were old code didn't compile on a new compiler. Rust isn't forwards compatible (new code compiles on an old compiler) of course, but what is?
remarkable
-
Sciter, the 5 MB Electron alternative, has switched to JavaScript
> we can't take some well-tested, used-by-millions library
You can.
Here is an example of Sciter application that uses RemarkableJS library (https://github.com/jonschlinkert/remarkable) as it is:
https://quark.sciter.com/quark-application-samples/hello-mar...
-
BREAKING!! NPM package ‘ua-parser-js’ with more than 7M weekly download is compromised
Since then they've made things that are IMO quite useful, like enquirer, micromatch, and remarkable.
-
Sciter officially switched to JavaScript
mdview (sources) uses RemarkableJS for MD->HTML conversion.
-
Tauri: An Electron alternative written in Rust
will give you split-view out-of-the-box. But web dev's will start looking for frameworks in order to achieve this simple task that browser have internally already.
TL;DR: Web and desktop UIs use inherently different models. You can share parts between these two different platforms but only parts, really.
[1] Remarkable JS: https://github.com/jonschlinkert/remarkable
What are some alternatives?
FluentValidation - A popular .NET validation library for building strongly-typed validation rules.
showdown - A bidirectional Markdown to HTML to Markdown converter written in Javascript
actix-net - A collection of lower-level libraries for composable network services.
ua-parser-js - UAParser.js - Free & open-source JavaScript library to detect user's Browser, Engine, OS, CPU, and Device type/model. Runs either in browser (client-side) or node.js (server-side).
AutoMapper - A convention-based object-object mapper in .NET.
sciter-js-sdk - Sciter.JS - Sciter but with QuickJS on board instead of my TIScript
rust-prehistory - historical archive of rust pre-publication development
react-markdown - Markdown component for React [Moved to: https://github.com/remarkjs/react-markdown]
Dapper - Dapper - a simple object mapper for .Net [Moved to: https://github.com/DapperLib/Dapper]
html-react-parser - 📝 HTML to React parser.
NUnit - NUnit Framework
enquirer - Stylish, intuitive and user-friendly prompts, for Node.js. Used by eslint, webpack, yarn, pm2, pnpm, RedwoodJS, FactorJS, salesforce, Cypress, Google Lighthouse, Generate, tencent cloudbase, lint-staged, gluegun, hygen, hardhat, AWS Amplify, GitHub Actions Toolkit, @airbnb/nimbus, and many others! Please follow Enquirer's author: https://github.com/jonschlinkert