crater
AutoMapper
Our great sponsors
crater | AutoMapper | |
---|---|---|
23 | 29 | |
610 | 9,754 | |
2.8% | 0.7% | |
7.8 | 8.1 | |
29 days ago | 10 days ago | |
Rust | C# | |
- | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
crater
-
Semver violations are common, better tooling is the answer
yup, they reference it as an inspiration: https://github.com/rust-lang/crater
it's probably impossible to automate an entire ecosystem, and there is value to enabling a tighter integration within a project ecosystem (a subset of the language ecosystem).
-
Trip Summer ISO C++ standards meeting (Varna, Bulgaria)
Rather than hypothesising about an imagined tool you could look at the actual tool which of course is in Rust's source code repo: https://github.com/rust-lang/crater
> new proposed C++ changes - are checked against only easily and "well-known" accessible package.
Now that I have, so to say, shown you mine, lets see yours. Where is the tool to perform these checks in C++?
-
GCC 13 and the state of gccrs
The "break things" part of "move fast" is not essential, Rust cares so much about breakage they literally compile and run the tests for every crate on crates.io and github using a tool called Crater. They do this just to test changes, even for stuff thats documented to be unstable, because thats just courtesy. And tooling makes it trivial to switch between Rust versions.
-
Do one thing, and do it well, or not.
The bot's named Crater if you want to look into it more.
-
Improving Rust compile times to enable adoption of memory safety
See https://github.com/rust-lang/crater
-
Discussion about the state of neovim's plugin ecosystem
Rust compiler developers use a tool called Crater to test potentially breaking compiler changes on all crates (Rust's name for libraries) uploaded to the official repository. If plugin stability is the issue, maybe a solution along these lines would be better than merging these plugins to Neovim's core?
-
Experienced C++ users: what do you like about Rust? How would you sell it to other C++ users?
https://github.com/rust-lang/crater is the bot they use to test proposed compiler/stdlib changes against slices of the crates.io library up to and including "all of it".
-
Data-driven performance optimization with Rust and Miri
The tool you're referring to is called Crater: https://github.com/rust-lang/crater.
- GHC 9.4.2 regresses being able to do math on aarch64
-
Rust for Linux officially merged
I'm pretty certain this isn't actually true. You should look at the editions, etc. Rust also has an insane guarantee which I am certain C/C++ don't offer: It rebuilds its entire library ecosystem each time it ships to make sure nothing breaks (https://crater.rust-lang.org). I've never seen an instance were old code didn't compile on a new compiler. Rust isn't forwards compatible (new code compiles on an old compiler) of course, but what is?
AutoMapper
-
Object Mapping in .NET
AutoMapper
-
Is AutoMapper 13.0 available?
The 13.0 Upgrade Guide page was created back in April, but there is no sign of the release yet.
- New Google Bard Update (can run code)
-
Is there a better way to map data in ASP ?
The most well-know is probably AutoMapper, but it's not universally liked.
- AutoMapper's open source code of conduct
-
Nightclub Website
AutoMapper - well for automapping
-
How to avoid AutoMapper configuration runtime errors
When working with AutoMapper, we often bump into runtime errors due to invalid mapping configuration, such as this one:
-
How to Build a WEB API ASP.NET Core 6
What problems will resolve automapper?
-
LINQ Formatters
If you are a fan of data mappers, you might want to enhance the implementation with additional extension methods. Here is an example for AutoMapper.
-
We released a new version of ShapeShift (0.4.0) - A lightweight Kotlin first library for Object Mapping. Would love to hear your thoughts!
I'm wondering myself. Most mappers like https://automapper.org/ will make a best effort mapper automatically via introspection. If this is just a DSL/annotation suite that requires explicit, complete mapping implementations then this strikes me as a re-implementation of parts of kotlin in kotlin.
What are some alternatives?
FluentValidation - A popular .NET validation library for building strongly-typed validation rules.
Mapster - A fast, fun and stimulating object to object Mapper
actix-net - A collection of lower-level libraries for composable network services.
mapperly - A .NET source generator for generating object mappings. No runtime reflection.
rust-prehistory - historical archive of rust pre-publication development
GraphQL for .NET - GraphQL for .NET
Dapper - Dapper - a simple object mapper for .Net [Moved to: https://github.com/DapperLib/Dapper]
Mapping Generator - :arrows_counterclockwise: "AutoMapper" like, Roslyn based, code fix provider that allows to generate mapping code in design time.
NUnit - NUnit Framework
Hot Chocolate - Welcome to the home of the Hot Chocolate GraphQL server for .NET, the Strawberry Shake GraphQL client for .NET and Banana Cake Pop the awesome Monaco based GraphQL IDE.
apollo-client-devtools - Apollo Client browser developer tools.
ExpressMapper - Mapping .Net types