api-guidelines VS tauri

Just wanting to let this here for some further input: - https://rust-lang.github.io/api-guidelines/ - https://rust-unofficial.github.io/patterns/ - https://deterministic.space/elegant-apis-in-rust.html

The API guidelines will help you write nice APIs. Clippy will usually at least find some things, try running with -Wclippy::pedantic for a lot more messages. Also you can ask mentors for specific guidance. Hope that helps.

There has been some previous discussion on this here: https://github.com/rust-lang/api-guidelines/discussions/28

I'm currently writing an API and using the API guidelines book. On the Flexibility page, there's a section on using generics as function parameters to minimize assumptions. The issue that I'm having is that the only example it gives is std::fs::File::open. Specifically, I want to know what is the "standard" way to use generics as parameters?

I search up in the rust-api-guideline, but no luck finding something like this. There used to be an Organization according to this thread, but upon digging the repo commits, it was deleted by this commit. "We can reintroduce this section if we come up with a way to give firmer advice here."

public api of a library should follow Rust API Guidelines.

API was made compliant with Rust API Guidelines.

Finally, there's also the Little Book of Rust Books where you could look for tutorial materials or things like like Rust Design Patterns, Rust API Guidelines, and The Rust Performance Book. (See also rust-learning)

Rust API Guidelines: If you're planning on building libraries or APIs in Rust, these guidelines provide recommendations for designing and presenting APIs in the language. They're written by the Rust library team, based on their experience building the Rust standard library and other crates in the ecosystem.

Hi, dear Tauri! Long time no see. I published my first post, Developing a Desktop Application via Rust and NextJS. The Tauri Way almost a year ago. Since then, Tauri has become stronger. I'm happy about that! And now, I am very pleased to make a useful contribution to the Tauri community. As a full-stack developer, I frequently face situations where I need to start a DB-based UI project as fast as possible. It's stressful if I need to start the project from 100% scratch. I prefer to keep some boilerplates on hand, which will save me time and nerves and will be the subject of this article.

Hey Thanks!

Just electron & vite. I might actually migrate off electron, Tauri (https://tauri.app/) seems to be getting more stable and it's gotten great reviews.

I think this is the boilerplate I used though https://github.com/cawa-93/vite-electron-builder.

Well the great thing about WebAssembly is that you can port QT or anything else to be at a layer below -- thanks to WebAssembly Interface Types[0] and the Component Model specification that works underneath that.

To over-simplify, the Component Model manages language interop, and WIT constrains the boundaries with interfaces.

IMO the problem here is defining a 90% solution for most window, tab, button, etc management, then building embeddings in QT, Flutter/Skia, and other lower level engines. Getting a good cross-platform way of doing data passing, triggering re-renders, serializing window state is probably the meat of the interesting work.

On top of that, you really need great UX. This is normally where projects fall short -- why should I use this solution instead of something like Tauri[2] which is excellent or Electron?

[0]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/component-model/blob/main/des...

[1]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/component-model/blob/main/des...

[2]: https://tauri.app/

Welcome to the 2nd episode of our series “Building with Tauri”, where we chat with developers who build amazing projects and products using Tauri.

Tauri seemed like the "thing" I should switch to because everybody loves Rust (heh), and because it ships significantly smaller apps.

First of all, I will be using npm as my package manager but feel free to use whatever you prefer. Find more info here.

Today I'm talking about Tauri! Do you know all the various tools that allow you to develop native applications starting from web languages? They often need an intermediate compilation, in the middle of which you end up encountering various problems not always transparent and directly solvable with a language mostly detached from native development. On the other hand, there's still the ease of developing attractive and easily usable interfaces, which are more difficult to develop with low level languages.