rust-iterators VS reference

rust-iterators - Max Skybin

For iterators, check this out: https://github.com/rustomax/rust-iterators

Is perfectly valid Rust code. And there's reborrow, too.

I truly appreciate how much effort u/ehuss puts into maintaining The Rust Reference, considering that documenting stuff is not usually a fun task people want to do. Not to mention that ehuss is also the Cargo team lead, responsible for developing one of the most loved tools in Rust. ehuss's insightful knowledge always ensures that Cargo works without unexpected surprises.

Here is (somewhat long) discussion on the topic with other examples: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/issues/788

The PR for updating the documentation is here, still under discussion: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1055

thank you this is definitely interesting and i need to read more. For anyone else, this is the thing I found about this issue when I looked it up. It's a github issue about how little documentation there is on the subject and that there should be more. Even the initial post has a lot of interesting details and links. Thanks for bringing it up although sorry it seems your comment went a bit over the heads of some redditors.

⭐ The Rust Reference - repo

For the rust reference, there is an open pull request https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1265/

&mut * is reborrowing which is allowed

Officialhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAl-9HwD858&list=PLqbS7AVVErFiWDOAVrPt7aYmnuuOLYvOa The official rust book Rust by example The rust docs Rustlings the most fun way imo

I've opened a PR to add this more prominently to the Conditional Compilation entry in the Rust reference.