rust-headless-chrome VS cloudscraper

I'm using this to fill forms interactively and emulate a user. https://github.com/rust-headless-chrome/rust-headless-chrome

Afaict, it drives a stock Chromium instance. I'm not sure how Fidelity is detecting it, but they detect it even in normal headful mode. Idk if there's some JS that notices there's no mouse-move movements.

It's just not worth the headache. I despise bending over backwards for companies like this. But obviously I have no choice since they're my 401k plan facilitator.

Thanks, I was looking into that as well and got their example up and running. I also saw that chromiumoxide mentions rust-headless-chrome in its references section in the README, which is also updated recently, any differences between the two? Seems like chromiumoxide is async with code gen whereas rust-headless-chrome is not, is that right?

mdBook allows you to create book from markdown files. It's pretty much alike Gitbook but implemented in Rust. However, unlike Gitbook that supports using calibre for generating PDF, for a long time, mdBook doesn't support generating PDF files natively, and supporting that is also not in their roadmap. Existing plugins (backends) such as mdbook-latex that utilize Tectonic as well as pandoc solutions will generate a PDF page that doesn't unify with the existing mdBook generated HTML version. Considering these facts, I created a mdBook backend named mdbook-pdf for generating PDF based on headless chrome and Chrome DevTools Protocol Page.printToPDF.

There's https://github.com/stevepryde/thirtyfour for Selenium, and https://github.com/atroche/rust-headless-chrome for Chromium.

I published headless-chrome a few years ago, but I haven't cut a new release in almost two years now — despite the issues and pull requests piling up. I'm not relying on it for my work like I was previously, and I just don't have the spare energy to be a good maintainer.

Try https://github.com/yifeikong/curl_cffi or https://github.com/VeNoMouS/cloudscraper , I believe you should be able to bypass this.

But scraping has definitely gotten tougher with services like cloudflare that even the popular cloudscraper gave up years ago and never made a comeback.

If you're scraping with Python, try cloudscraper—among other things(!), it supports JS rendering (basically the bare-minimum check cloudflare does), without needing to run a full browser in the background. It's built on requests, so integration (for me, anyway) was pretty easy.

https://github.com/venomous/cloudscraper

I've tried using Cloudscraper here https://github.com/VeNoMouS/cloudscraper but I get the following error:

No amount of googling turns up anything. There are others with the same problem - but no real solution. In the gitlab README it explains that to solve CAPTCHAs with cloudscraper you need an API key, which would explain the error that it's not available in the free version. But for the life of me, I can't find where to get a key or any other solution.

cloudscraper

Anyone with a stake in bypassing anti-bot measures isn't going to share their tactics, since sharing it will lead to such workaround being patched or mitigated, requiring them to research for more bot detection workarounds.

Projects like cloudscraper[0] are often linked to point and say "look! they broke Cloudflare!" but CF and the rest of the industry has detections for tools like this, and instead of rolling out blocks for these tools, they give website owners tools like bot score[1] to manage their own risk level on a per-page basis.

0: https://github.com/VeNoMouS/cloudscraper

1: https://developers.cloudflare.com/bots/concepts/bot-score/

This is being used: https://github.com/VeNoMouS/cloudscraper