rust-esp32-std-demo VS cargo-generate

This is my link: https://github.com/ivmarkov/rust-esp32-std-demo

A complete STD demo on ESP32C3

I'm trying lots of Rust demos (including rust-esp32-std-demo, esp32-spooky-maze-game) for ESP32 on my M5GO kit with ili9342c controller and all of them struggle to give fullscreen (320x240) frame-rate > 5.

I used this demo as a guide, it uses esp-idf for rust, and allows you to use std

rust-esp32-std-demo works quite well with WiFi, HTTPS and MQTTS. The only thing I could not make work (but I did not put much effort into it) was using async primitives. That part seems to be experimental, indeed.

FWIW I've very recently gotten https://github.com/ivmarkov/rust-esp32-std-demo (which is a pretty comprehensive demo) running on a TinyPICO (w/ESP32) and am looking forward to building out my own projects next.

I'm using this template project to get started with the esp32, though I've started fresh in a new main function. Every time I build the project -even if I only add a blank line to main - it seems to re-compile bindgen and embuild, and regenerate the bindings for a variety of packages that have C components. I haven't made any changes to these though and the process takes a full 90 seconds. In addition nothing in the bindings that are getting generated shows up in intellisense in vscode. Any help appreciated.

This worked fairly well for me. I assume that's where the book takes you, bit I've missed if you said if you're trying to use std or no_std. https://github.com/ivmarkov/rust-esp32-std-demo

cargo-generate: Quickly create Rust projects by using existing Git repositories as templates.

This seems to have a lot of overlap with cargo generate. I'm curious if there are differences you're exploring in philosophy/UX/features/implementation/whatever?

cargo-generate to generate projects according to a template (see cargo-generate)

That must be the connector/payment processor integration template. That's not serde specific, it's cargo-generate.

Tools like yeoman, degit, and cargo generate kept me happy for years. They add basic templating capabilities to the standard git clone but they stop there. You’ll be hard pressed to find tools that go beyond setting up a directory structure.

We would like to simply the next step and use cargo-generate tool to create our Arduino project from a template. Somehow (please, do not ask me why) it requires Perl to compile, so we have to do:

How does backpack compare to [cargo generate](https://github.com/cargo-generate/cargo-generate)? I've been using that one until now, but I haven't used its more advanced features.

Currently, it has two built-in ones for `cargo new` and `cargo init` (--bin and --lib) and there are third-party tools like `cargo generate` which provide for more, but they haven't accepted anything into the main distribution yet.

https://github.com/cargo-generate/cargo-generate