routing-controllers VS architect

The standard is express. I say that with some glibness, but its the only true answer: a ton of the other higher level frameworks and pluggable middlewares still rely on the core express Request/Response types. And there are a ton of higher level frameworks, if the number of distinct replies wasn't obvious.

I really like express + routing-controllers [1], if you're on typescript.

[1] https://github.com/typestack/routing-controllers

I currently use https://github.com/typestack/routing-controllers and https://github.com/epiphone/routing-controllers-openapi with https://github.com/Redocly/redoc

If I don’t want to use nest then I would use express or koa with routing-controllers. Using this package you can write controllers with classes and decorators which is similar to nest js. There are a lot of other features too.

I had been running dockeri.co with https://arc.codes/ for pennies a month.

Then, one month, I got a ~$500 bill out of no where.

Docker had changed an api causing my service to return 5xx errors all month. Each error was individually logged to CloudWatch - which racked up a ~$500 bill.

I moved to Cloudflare Workers that day and haven’t moved back.

We use https://github.com/architect/architect to test, provision and deploy the functional web app via GitHub Actions (…whenever they work ;). For the UI/UX we work with https://tailwindui.com and paid them for their great work.

I use https://arc.codes/ for deploying to AWS Lambda/API Gateway. It does a really good job with Remix and NestJS and is easy enough. I like that all I have to do is give a very simple config, and it builds the apps, zips the function code, uploads all my static assets, and then generates and deploys the CloudFormation. I am curious to migrate off as I do have to do some workarounds and it doesn't seem to have a ton of traction.

Not sure why this is downvoted, Fastify is quite popular and the 'generator for everything' approach of Koa didn't really take off.

Architect serverless (https://arc.codes) is pretty good for serverless.

Architect is a heavily opinionated framework for building FWA's, Functional Web Apps. It uses AWS SAM under the hood but provides a layer on top with simplified abstractions that lets developers define and use AWS infrastructure without necessarily knowing what service is backing their "events" construct.

I work for vercel but I highly recommend a host like us because we make it a lot easier to manage a lambda environment and being a lot more to the table (cdn, edge functions, etc). If you want to go your own I really like architect https://arc.codes too. It really depends on your traffic and application patterns but cold starts can be virtually nil.

It uses: - Remix for the frontend - Architect for the backend

Alternately, use Architect. Architect is a 3rd party developer experience that builds on top of AWS SAM. Architect includes a TypeScript plugin.

For us at Begin and Architect, tape has been in use for several years. tape has a stable and straightforward API, routine maintenance updates, and outputs TAP, making it really versatile. While TAP is legible, it's not the most human-readable format. Fortunately, several TAP reporters can help display results for developers. Until recently, Begin's TAP reporter of choice was tap-spec. Sadly tap-spec wasn't kept up to date and npm began reporting vulnerabilities.