reviewpad VS github-pr-exporter

This is why we are seeing increased adoption of tools such as ReviewPad that automate the review process and instill confidence in code changes. Reducing the need for manual intervention and overall reducing the time it takes for customers to see value in the applications you are developing.

By the way, PRs can be also automated. At work we are using Reviewpad for that: https://reviewpad.com/ But also we are using some custom GHA workflows as well.

Depending on the code submitted, we could imagine that developers are free to merge if they consider there’s no risk and need to assign a reviewer, and they should ask for two reviewers if the code changes are critical. That’s the idea promoted by the Ship Show Ask model. With solutions like Reviewpad, you can implement your assignment and merge rules depending on the content of the review.

reviewpad.yml that runs Reviewpad;

I built a prometheus exporter that takes in a config file with a list of users and will use the GitHub search API to find pull requests created by said users. This exporter exposes some useful data such as user, created_at, status and link.