reviewpad
Next generation pull requests and issues 🦄 (by reviewpad)
pro
⚡️A single command to quickly open current PR in browser. Supports GitHub and GitLab. (by Wowu)
| reviewpad | pro | |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 1 | |
| 199 | 42 | |
| -2.0% | - | |
| 7.3 | 0.0 | |
| 9 days ago | 6 months ago | |
| Go | Go | |
| GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0 only | MIT License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
reviewpad
Posts with mentions or reviews of reviewpad.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-05-26.
-
The Evolution of Code Reviews: A Better Tomorrow
This is why we are seeing increased adoption of tools such as ReviewPad that automate the review process and instill confidence in code changes. Reducing the need for manual intervention and overall reducing the time it takes for customers to see value in the applications you are developing.
-
How is CI/CD initially triggered? By commit locally or pushing to remote?
By the way, PRs can be also automated. At work we are using Reviewpad for that: https://reviewpad.com/ But also we are using some custom GHA workflows as well.
-
7 frustrations to avoid with code review best practices
Depending on the code submitted, we could imagine that developers are free to merge if they consider there’s no risk and need to assign a reviewer, and they should ask for two reviewers if the code changes are critical. That’s the idea promoted by the Ship Show Ask model. With solutions like Reviewpad, you can implement your assignment and merge rules depending on the content of the review.
-
Modern Trunk-Based Development
reviewpad.yml that runs Reviewpad;
pro
Posts with mentions or reviews of pro.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing reviewpad and pro you can also consider the following projects:
action - GitHub action to supercharge your pull request and issues workflows!
acyl - Testing Environments On Demand
slsa - Supply-chain Levels for Software Artifacts
Gitea - Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD
cli - GitHub’s official command line tool
github-pr-exporter - A prometheus exporter for monitoring pull requests for specified users in the last X number of days.
github-compare - A GitHub repositories statistics command-line tool for the terminal
developer-resources - A collection of resources to help engineering teams review pull requests faster and improve their workflow.