routersploit
Cppcheck
routersploit | Cppcheck | |
---|---|---|
1 | 11 | |
9,697 | 5,454 | |
- | - | |
0.8 | 9.9 | |
over 2 years ago | 1 day ago | |
Python | C++ | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
routersploit
-
Awesome Penetration Testing
routersploit - Open source exploitation framework similar to Metasploit but dedicated to embedded devices.
Cppcheck
-
Configuring Cppcheck, Cpplint, and JSON Lint
I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end.
- Cppcheck/Releasenotes.txt
-
Enforcing Memory Safety?
Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code.
-
Check out my tasks.json for C++ of VScode
Also check out (cppcheck)[https://github.com/danmar/cppcheck] if you want more static analysis
-
What are the must-have tools for any C++ developer?
My browser refuses to open that link. This is better: https://github.com/danmar/cppcheck
-
Awesome Penetration Testing
cppcheck - Extensible C/C++ static analyzer focused on finding bugs.
-
C/C++ pre-commit hooks for static analyzers and linters
and five C/C++ static code analyzers: * clang-tidy * oclint * cppcheck * cpplint (recently added!) * include-what-you-use (recently added!)
-
Caught signal 11 (SIGSEGV) and signal 6 (SIGABRT)
Start by feeding your codebase to a static analysis tool like cppcheck, to rule out obvious bound-checking mistakes in it.
- How to detect stack corruption in embedded c??
-
Why static analysis on C projects is not widespread already?
Cppcheck is free. I've previously used it with a C++ project.
What are some alternatives?
Metasploit - Metasploit Framework
cpplint - Static code checker for C++
Wordlist-Generator - A python tool capable of creating HUGE wordlists. Has the ability to add custom words for concatenation in any way you see fit.
gcc-poison - gcc-poison
routersploit - Exploitation Framework for Embedded Devices
stb - stb single-file public domain libraries for C/C++
bettercap - The Swiss Army knife for 802.11, BLE, IPv4 and IPv6 networks reconnaissance and MITM attacks.
cmake-lint - Fork of https://github.com/richq/cmake-lint to continue maintenance
awesome-industrial-control-system-security - A curated list of resources related to Industrial Control System (ICS) security.
American Fuzzy Lop - american fuzzy lop - a security-oriented fuzzer
dnstwist - Domain name permutation engine for detecting homograph phishing attacks, typo squatting, and brand impersonation
c-smart-pointers - Smart pointers for the (GNU) C programming language