reorder-python-imports VS ruff

Two developers on the same python project should also use the same version... with poetry it is straightforward to keep track of dev dependencies. Reorder python imports is an alternative for isort: https://github.com/asottile/reorder_python_imports

I’ve been using Ruff, which is a very fast Python linter and code formatter, built in Rust. It handles a bunch of tools all in one, like Black, isort, and more.

I agree, it's unreasonable to expect devs to know the whole standard library. The VSCode extension Pylance does give a warning when this happens. I thought linters might also check this. The one I use doesn't, maybe the issue[0] I just created will lead to it being implemented.

[0]: https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/13676

Ruff is incredibly fast and does 80% of what I want -- that's my go-to for finding bugs for me to fix.

As I personally would like to see an HTTP client for Python developed and maintained by a major company. And Rust shows itself very well as a library language for Python. Let's remember at least Ruff and Pydantic v2.

I want to add linting capabilities to Satyrn (a Jupyter notebook client application I'm working on), so I looked into integrating ruff, a python linting and code formatting tool. This tool follows the Language Server Protocol, so as long as I can figure out how to follow that protocol, I should be able to use it in my app.

2. Ruff: Superfast Linting and Formatting

Ruff is an open-source Python linter created by Astral Sh that stands out for its impressive speed, adaptability, and wide-ranging features.

Leverage Python Tools: Tapyr takes advantage of Python’s ecosystem tools, including ruff, pytest, and others.

I think I mention this all the time when this comes up, but I learned the most 'best practices' through using ruff.

https://docs.astral.sh/ruff/

I just installed and enabled all the rules by setting