remarks VS reMarkableWeb

In reMarkable's stock output, highlighted text is not textured with PDF annotations, and so its highlights are not readable by any PDF client. You would still need to use third-party software for that. The only two I know of are RCU and remarks.

Which firmware are you on? For 2.15 and below, there are a couple tools that will export real PDF highlight annotation. I use (and am the author of) RCU, which can export both PDF highlights and layers, but there is also remarks if you are comfortable with something more hacky.

But this is only half of the story, these files do not contain highlights or scribbles. That is where another open-source library comes into play, remarks see here.

I had the same problem and although there are tools like remarks the idea is to make it automatic and not waste any time fixing anything (or at least for me), for That's why I recommend you use annotator, the plugin is simple but it exports all metadata in plain text.

I use rsync, but not with a cron. Check out https://github.com/lucasrla/remarkable-utils for an easy implementation of rsync. If you want to mark up pdf files and then get your annotations, check out https://github.com/lucasrla/remarks

I use https://github.com/lucasrla/remarks, which OCRs your highlights to extract what exactly was highlighted, and also outputs screenshots of all pages on which I wrote notes.

This way I can go through my annotations sequentially, save highlights / their main ideas, and reformulate my notes into plaintext a bit more clearly.

With software that can insert/export PDF highlight annotations, like remarks or my own RCU, you may then use Zotero to extract these highlights. This used to be part of a plug-in called Zotfile, but IIRC this can now be done in Zotero directly.

On a side note, thank you for mentioning RMRL! I'd been using remarks, but it has a number of shortcomings, most of which are not present in RMRL.

There's a web-app (https://remarkable-web.vercel.app) which allows you to export highlighted text. It is useful but not perfect. For some weeks (or months) it disappeared. I just ask for an official, reliable, way of doing something most 30$ ebooks can do.

I am currently reading many books and papers and use highlighting a lot. My life would be a lot better if I could automatically extract the highlighted text. I tried several (by now outdated) solutions like Biff (https://github.com/soulisalmed/biff ), RCU and https://remarkable-web.vercel.app/ . The first two are apparently outdated, and the last I can't connect to (and all my files are >4 MB, so manual select doesn't work).

Since I discovered this app (https://remarkable-web.vercel.app/), I've been using it to extract some highlights.

I'm still on 2.15 and my work relies on https://remarkable-web.vercel.app/ to extract highlights from PDFs I mark up. Seems like reMarkable's updates have broken the directory browsing feature there, but I can still upload reMarkable PDFs manually and get my highlights.

They also have appeared to change the web api such that it has broken https://remarkable-web.vercel.app/.

I can't export any annotated pdfs since the beta installed. With the desktop app or the remarkable itself. Also https://remarkable-web.vercel.app/ seems to not work with the beta. So far the beta has completely broken the pdf annotation workflow as well as problemitizing reading pdfs.

Digest -- that also extracts all your highlights and notes for easy review. Here a workaround is to use https://remarkable-web.vercel.app for extracting highlights, and inserting blank pages in pdfs for more extensive notes.

However, recently, I discovered a non-hack app that allows me to extract my highlights, export them as a Markdown file (there's the possibility to connect Readwise) and use them in Obsidian.

Standard recognisable highlights (I made a post about it). Recently I discovered Remarkable-web, a very useful tool to extract my highlights. However this should be supported by the very company.