relude
🌀 Safe, performant, user-friendly and lightweight Haskell standard library (by kowainik)
lifted-protolude
By parsonsmat
Our great sponsors
| relude | lifted-protolude | |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | - | |
| 687 | - | |
| 0.4% | - | |
| 6.0 | - | |
| 3 months ago | - | |
| Haskell | ||
| MIT License | MIT License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
relude
Posts with mentions or reviews of relude.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-01-06.
-
GHCanIUse - GHC language extensions compatibility table
I've also hoped that the "standard library" (i.e. Prelude) should be redesigned. I just found relude which looks very promising.
-
Good Haskell Source Code
Project to look at is: https://github.com/kowainik/relude.
-
Assessing Haskell (blogpost, slightly negative!)
Another good practice to prevent runtime exceptions is to avoid partial functions like head and tail. One way to ensure that one doesn't accidentally slip in is to use an alternative prelude (e.g. relude) that doesn't export them by default. Another alternative is to use hlint to warn about them (and then import their safe counterparts instead).
-
How do I code for the Maybe type for the following code?
That note is wrong, it is only a problem if the function input has a large cardinality. I opened a PR to fix this: https://github.com/kowainik/relude/pull/389
-
Folding Nonempty Structures In Haskell
And relude.
lifted-protolude
Posts with mentions or reviews of lifted-protolude.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects.
We haven't tracked posts mentioning lifted-protolude yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing relude and lifted-protolude you can also consider the following projects:
protolude - A sensible starting Prelude template.
universum - :milky_way: Prelude written in @Serokell
papa-lens-export - export useful functions from lens
base-prelude - The most complete prelude formed only from the "base" package
mtl-prelude - Reexports of most definitions from "mtl" and "transformers"
preamble - Yet Another Prelude
microbase - A minimal base reexporting hardwired stuff to get around GHC bugs
humble-prelude
cronus - Another bloated standard library.
papa - Reasonable Haskell default import
prolude - :hatching_chick: ACI Learning's custom prelude.
relude vs protolude
lifted-protolude vs universum
relude vs universum
lifted-protolude vs papa-lens-export
relude vs base-prelude
lifted-protolude vs mtl-prelude
relude vs preamble
lifted-protolude vs microbase
relude vs humble-prelude
lifted-protolude vs cronus
relude vs papa
lifted-protolude vs prolude