registry VS ESLint

More important than the namespace is who published the package. I'm more inclined to trust an individual I know who takes security than a namespace that may change hands.

NPM exposes that info in the _npmUser field: https://github.com/npm/registry/blob/master/docs/REGISTRY-AP.... That gives "name" (NPM username) and email.

While there are thousands of packages, I bet there's a much smaller number of publishers to worry about.

I can't find anything about it in their docs. https://github.com/npm/registry/blob/master/docs/REGISTRY-API.md

https://github.com/npm/registry/blob/master/docs/REGISTRY-API.md here are the docs. I was getting 122ms responses instead of 9000 on the old one.

My first instinct was to work with the public API of the npm registry. This sounds like a very good idea, but you will soon run into a set of problems (cache, private registry etc..).

There is no need to obtain an API key or token for querying NPM registry API. For the dashboard, I use only the endpoint that provides the data about a package downloads count - https://api.npmjs.org/downloads/. You can read more about it here.

While many people regularly use npm's website to discover packages, only a few know that npm also provides a public REST API accessible at registry.npmjs.org.

Or roll your own, docs here: https://github.com/npm/registry/blob/master/docs/download-counts.md

ESLint: A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript.

Automating code checks with static code analysis allows us to enforce code styling effectively. By integrating tools into our workflow, we can identify errors at an early stage, while coding instead of blocking us at the end. For instance, flake8 checks Python code for style and errors, eslint performs similar checks for JavaScript, and prettier automatically formats code to maintain consistency.

If you're a developer, you're surely familiar with Prettier and ESLint. With over 8 years of existence, they have established themselves as references in the JavaScript ecosystem.

eslint is used to avoid code errors

No lint errors: The committed code does not contain any lint errors (eslint).

Let’s walk through the steps for a one-time setup to configure husky pre-commit and pre-push hooks, ESLint with code styles conventions, prettier code formatter, and lint-staged. Husky automatically runs a script on each commit or push. This is useful for linting files to enforce code styles that keeps the entire code base following conventions.

GitHub | Website

ESLint: A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript.

ESLint

1. Lack of Static Code Analysis Static code analysis tools like TypeScript and ESLint play a crucial role in identifying and preventing bugs. TypeScript provides static typing, enhancing the robustness of the code. ESLint detects issues and enforces coding standards. The absence of these tools can significantly elevate the likelihood of bugs due to the lack of early detection and guidance provided during development.