red-mail VS RapidFuzz

These two are more user friendly alternatives for sending and receiving emails: - Red Mail - Red Box

Take a look at red-mail package.

Red-mail was appealing, but I was not pleased with the misleading error message when a connection failed. Nor was I pleased to see there are no log messages in the code.

It's the creator of Rocketry, Red Mail and Red Box again. This week I thought to make it easier to integrate command-line programs to your Python applications.

Some of you might know my other project, Red Mail, advanced email sender. This time I have quite a similar library to show, I just released a sister library for it: Red Box, the advanced email reader.

For example, you can send emails using built-in smtplib and email, but there is also Red Mail. Which provides you simpler interface.

I'm actually the author of Red Mail (email sending library) and Rocketry (Pythonic statement-based scheduler). I'm actually looking for example projects to create some practical tutorials of how one could use the libraries. Not sure which kind would be appealing to most and what kind of problems people have with alternative options (which I could address).

This can be easily achieved with Red Mail (for email sending), Red Bird (for handling the data in an abstract way) and Rocketry (for scheduling):

I have made a pretty handy SMTP sender for Python if the language is a bit familiar (the lib is extremely easy to use): https://github.com/Miksus/red-mail

Tried it, but it fails here: RUN pip3 install git+https://github.com/maxbachmann/RapidFuzz

RapidFuzz has been the most promising fuzzy matcher in my findings with .cdist()

RapidFuzz is a faster implementation.

For fuzzy matching - there's Rapidfuzz.

There is also https://github.com/maxbachmann/RapidFuzz which uses the MIT license.

RapidFuzz