record VS funflow

Compare record vs funflow and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
record funflow
- 3
244 360
- -0.3%
0.0 3.5
about 5 years ago 3 months ago
Haskell Haskell
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

record

Posts with mentions or reviews of record. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

We haven't tracked posts mentioning record yet.
Tracking mentions began in Dec 2020.

funflow

Posts with mentions or reviews of funflow. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-10-20.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing record and funflow you can also consider the following projects:

objective - Purely functional objects

ChannelT - Generalized stream processors

recursion-schemes - Generalized bananas, lenses and barbed wire

hask - Category theory for Haskell with a lens flavor (you need GHC 7.8.3, not 7.8.2 to build this!)

monad-control - Lift control operations, like exception catching, through monad transformers

lens-tutorial - The missing tutorial module for the lens library

apecs - a fast, extensible, type driven Haskell ECS framework for games

selective - Selective Applicative Functors: Declare Your Effects Statically, Select Which to Execute Dynamically

mmorph - Monad morphisms