rebalance-lnd
circuitbreaker
rebalance-lnd | circuitbreaker | |
---|---|---|
22 | 13 | |
341 | 118 | |
- | -0.8% | |
6.2 | 7.5 | |
1 day ago | 4 months ago | |
Python | Go | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
rebalance-lnd
-
Rebalancing Channels
Additionally I use rebalance-lnd to rebalance channels manually. BOS can also rebalance as well as perfectly balanced.
- What can I do with my skill of writing Python in the Bitcoin space?
-
π MiniBolt resources π List of the MiniBolt core/bonus guides + latest versions
rebalance-lnd v2.3 (Released: 17th January 2022) - https://github.com/C-Otto/rebalance-lnd/releases
-
The Lightning Network is fast, but it kinda sucks.
Are you using channel rebalancing tools at all? Like Balance of Satoshis, or rebalance-lnd? I really like the latter.
- Automate balancing with tools, is there good recent tutorial [end of 2022]?
-
LN for merchants, some questions
Take a look at rebalance-lnd: https://github.com/C-Otto/rebalance-lnd
- Lightning Network is User Unfriendly
-
β‘Raspibolt Twice-Monthly Rundown - π Jan 17th, 2022β‘ Guide & software updates, new Github pull requests & issues and other news
rebalance-lnd v2.3: Release page - Upgrade guide
- What actions should I take in RTL to properly balance these channels?
-
β‘ Lightning Thursday! November 25, 2021: Explore the Lightning Network!β‘
There are some tools like this but it is very hard to automate rebalancing since each node market dynamics is different. And it changes constantly. You can automate but you have to constantly update the logic.
circuitbreaker
-
π MiniBolt resources π List of the MiniBolt core/bonus guides + latest versions
Circuit Breaker v0.3.1 (Released: 25th July 2022) - https://github.com/lightningequipment/circuitbreaker/tags
- How will Bitcoin scale?
-
β‘ RaspiBolt Improvement Proposals & Bounties π°
A lightning 'firewall' to avoid griefing attacks (see Github repo, and Bitcoin Magazine article). Alpha quality so should be as an option, not in main guide yet.
-
Stealing Sats from the Lightning Network Custodial Services
In the case depicted in Fig-2, our routing node is directly connected to the custodial service. This is ideal to optimize the attack: the deposits have no cost, HTLCs will settle quickly, and we avoid the limitations set by other routing nodes using CircuitBreaker (payments fail when a few HTLCs are pending). If the attack is successful, having a lot of inbound liquidity from other nodes is key. The channel to the custodial service will quickly become unusable as we have stolen the liquidity to our side. Therefore, you want to desuturate it by circular rebalancing. Once we free up inbound liquidity from the custodial service, the channels to our liquidity providers will be saturated, we can chose to close those and move the profits on-chain or we could loop out (not sure which process is less costly: we are making free BTC, does it even matter?)
-
Nano developing interest from a BTC maximalist
That's old news from last year. Already been addressed: https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/pull/4527 https://github.com/lightningequipment/circuitbreaker
- Flood & Loot: A Systemic Attack On The Lightning Network
-
A bearish case for Nano: a discussion about bitcoin's scalability and a comparison of Nano with other altcoins.
The nano shiller proceeds with more FUD: "Ya but LN has many security issues, there is the famous flood & loot attack, you should google it". What the nano shillers either don't know, or as I would expect from them, consciously omit is that we already have a sort of "firewall" for this attack and this problem has been fixed. I suspect consciously because they always claim bitcoin is not scalable when this is obviously false and they know that too.
-
Rounding up fees? Min fee?
Ah ok I misunderstood your question then. The third option is what i use also. For your 4th option take a look at https://github.com/lightningequipment/circuitbreaker where an hold fee for an htlc was discussed. The base fee part could probably be used as you suggest as fourth option but I do not think something like this is implemented anywhere yet.
-
Which are the most delusional crypto supporters, in your opinion
1) Flood & Loot attacks have been fixed. Source 1 & Source 2.
-
Flood & Loot attack: A vulnerability of the lightning network
And here https://github.com/lightningequipment/circuitbreaker
What are some alternatives?
charge-lnd - charge-lnd is a simple policy based fee manager for LND. With this tool you can set fees to autobalance, recover channel open costs, use on-chain fees as reference, use channel activity to determine fees or just use static fees.
lnd - Lightning Network Daemon β‘οΈ
lndmanage - Channel management tool for lightning network daemon (LND) operators.
lightning - Core Lightning β Lightning Network implementation focusing on spec compliance and performance
balanceofsatoshis - Tool for working with the balance of your satoshis on LND
rain - π§ BitTorrent client and library in Go
lightning-docs - Some in-depth articles about the Lightning Network
howmanyconfs.com - How many confirmations are equivalent to 6 Bitcoin confirmations?
lndfeesmanager
ln-fee-siphoning - A collection of scripts to steal BTC from Lightning Network enabled custodial services. Only for educational purpose! Share your findings only when design flaws are fixed.
electrum - Electrum Bitcoin Wallet
Muun recovery - Muun recovery tool