react-svelte VS budibase

React’s changes over time have always been broadly compatible, and the same under the hood, just presented and manipulated a different way at the surface. Migrating to anything like Svelte would be a radical and extremely incompatible change on multiple fronts. It’s never, ever going to happen; the closest you’ll get will be another layer on top of React that embeds something like Svelte—such as https://github.com/Rich-Harris/react-svelte.

Svelte’s approach requires detailed knowledge of the structure of state, and requires compilation: components’ blocks are not written in JavaScript, but rather a language with the same general syntax but different semantics, and some places where JavaScript is too flexible to be tractable get replaced with special template syntax (like {#each} instead of for-loops or Array.prototype.map). Svelte cannot be implemented as a JavaScript library (I disqualify eval()). Svelte is also deliberately severely limited in what it can express in various places, whereas React gives you the full power of JavaScript (for better and for worse).<p>You could perhaps implement an optimising compiler for a small subset of React components that avoid problematic patterns and are written in TypeScript with proper specifications of the types of state and props; but if you considered it unacceptable for this compiler to change the component’s semantics, I think you’d be surprised at how little serious React code in the wild could actually be supported. Even simple loops <i>might</i> be out of reach. The Svelte approach can’t be a progressive enhancement, it’s an all-or-nothing (at the component level).

Budibase is great at generating CRUD apps based on a model.

https://budibase.com/

Congratulations to the Airplane team.

Is this Airtable moving in the direction of low-code rather than no code? Puts them up against tools like Budibase [https://github.com/Budibase/budibase] and Retool [Https://retool.com]

I skipped to chapter 9 in the article ("Clogged"), and it looked like Pipes failed because it didn't have a large enough team or a well-defined mission. As a result they couldn't offer a super robust product that would lure in enterprise users. "You could not purchase some number of guaranteed-to-work Pipes calls per month" is the quote from the article.

The reason I think that interesting is because that's the model these days for everything from AI tokens to Monday.com seats. It makes me feel like Pipes was before its time.

That said I've been collecting different "business glue" products that are similar to Pipes. To me, like you say, they aren't as interesting, exciting and intuitive as Pipes was, but maybe it just takes a little more digging. I tried to focus on open source tools but some aren't.

- n8n io: https://n8n.io/integrations/mondaycom/

- Node-RED: https://nodered.org/ (just read about this one in this thread)

- trigger dev: trigger.dev

- automatisch.io: https://automatisch.io/docs/

- Activepieces: https://www.activepieces.com/docs/getting-started/introducti...

- Huginn: https://github.com/huginn/huginn

- budibase: https://budibase.com/

- windmill: https://www.windmill.dev/

- tooljet: https://www.tooljet.com/workflows

- Bracket: https://www.usebracket.com/pricing (just SalesForce <-> PostgreSQL)

- Zapier: zapier.com/

Anyway I hope some of these are fun!

Budibase is open-source, including the workflow platform which has helped accelerate thousands of workflows already:

https://github.com/Budibase/budibase

(4) Budibase | Build internal tools in minutes, the easy way. https://budibase.com/.

Also missing these app builders, both of which are open source but offer managed hosting:

* Budibase https://budibase.com

Buildbase