react-fiber-architecture VS ava

Here is great documentation for you to follow if you are interested in understanding the core concepts.

Can someone remind me why virtual DOM was/is desirable in the first place and why updating the DOM directly is desirable now?

If I understand correctly react elements are created in memory, and only upon "render" it is turned into the actual DOM. Supposedly manipulating the actual DOM is "heavy" hence delay/pruning the virtual DOM tree first then rendering would be beneficial? Then why is it working with DOM directly is desirable? And am I right to assume that "without virtual DOM" means work with DOM directly? Someone in the comment mention that Svelte is without vDOM already. Is there some design document that I can refer to, like the reconciliation engine used in react https://github.com/acdlite/react-fiber-architecture

Перевод статьи Эндрю Кларка “React Fiber Architecture” https://github.com/acdlite/react-fiber-architecture

Over the years, new view libraries that are even more performant than React have emerged. React may not be the fastest library out there, but in terms of the ecosystem, overall usage experience and benefits, it is still one of the greatest. Facebook is also channeling efforts into making React even faster with a rewrite of the underlying reconciliation algorithm. The concepts that React introduced has taught us how to write better code, more maintainable web apps and made us better engineers. We like that.

The concept is a bit complex, but if you're interested in finding out how we might see React in a few years, you can read this documentation from the React page: https://github.com/acdlite/react-fiber-architecture

Fiber is the new reconciliation engine in React 16. Its main goal is to enable incremental rendering of the virtual DOM. This is a complicated concept, basically, this new algorithm is a reimplementation of older versions of the React reconciler, has some improvements on prioritizing the order of how things are rendered, breaks the limits of the call stack, and lets it pause or start rendering work wherever required. You can read more here and here

The result was "Jikji" library (why Jikji? it will need another blog:)) ). It uses React Fiber to get the component hierarchy and reorganized, split, and layout the components before rendering and making a print-ready web view that can easily be printed or converted to PDF or images.

The mechanism to diff one tree with another to determine which parts need to be changed and then update the original DOM with it is called Reconciliation. You can learn about Reconciliation here. ReactJS uses a new reconciliation engine called Fiber since version 16.0. You can read more about the React Fiber Architecture here.

We use Jest Framework for testing. Jest is not a dogma, and, of course, in its place can be any other test runner, such as Mocha or Ava. Let's focus on tests. I'll provide a short example because I don’t want to waste your time. You can find the full version here. It's crucial to read the comments in the code below. Let's go!

> In the popular jest test runner, each test file is executed in its own child process.

Is that confirmed?

I've been following this issue:

https://github.com/jestjs/jest/issues/6957

And what Jest actually does is still kind of muddy.

In contrast to that, other test runners like AVA have a clear description what happens when:

https://github.com/avajs/ava/blob/main/docs/01-writing-tests...

I've been looking at using japa or ava for web server testing but was curious what others were using and why.

Continued work on the test suite. Implementing AVA, with snapshotting. Making a lot of effort to have the snapshot directory structure match the test262 test directory structure by generating AVA test files.

You might want to give ava a spin:

https://github.com/avajs/ava/

It has a TAP reporter, but more importantly, as opposed to the more popular solutions, like Jest, the way it achieves parallelism is explained in the docs and won't change anytime soon, thus preventing wonky, hard to debug errors which occur when this part is abstracted away.

I switched to ava for that reason and have been very happy with it. But vitest looks nice, too. Thanks for the pointer.

Runs unit tests using AVA.

Last but not least important are ava, uvu and tape; they are a really light and fast test runners.

I've had some good experiences with Ava + Sinon. I've personally disliked Jest because it seemed to do some weird trickery in the background that prevented me from using ES modules.

Ava for a simpler environment than Jest, which I usually use. I need to check how to mock ESM with it, though.