react-chrono VS primereact

Github: https://github.com/prabhuignoto/react-chrono

dude are you serious? https://react-chrono.prabhumurthy.com/ see this and tell me where you need to look it up?

React-Chrono can come in handy if you need a React component allowing you to visually present the sequence of events over a specific period of time. This timeline component enables you to depict events in three modes (horizontal, vertical, vertical-alternating) or autoplay the whole timeline chart in slideshow mode. It is possible to make the timeline more informative by complementing it with images, videos, icons, or any other custom items. You can navigate the timeline chart via scrolling or with a keyboard. Useful resources: GitHub repository Package size: 290 kB License: MIT

The React package react-chrono can be used to build beautiful-looking timelines that come in handy for your portfolio. Our community member Koji wrote about how to use it with Contentful. Thank you, Koji!

> It’s important to be aware of what you are getting if you go with React, and what you are getting is a far cry from what a framework would offer, with all the corresponding pros and cons.

Would you like to elaborate on that?

In my experience, with something as great, size/ecosystem-wise as React, there will almost always be at least one "mainstream" package for whatever you might want to do with it, that integrates pretty well. Where a lot of things might come out of the box with a framework, with a library I often find myself just needing to install the "right" package, and from there it's pretty much the same.

For example, using https://angular.io/guide/i18n-overview or installing and using https://react.i18next.com/

Or something like https://angular.io/guide/form-validation out of the box, vs installing and using https://formik.org/

Or perhaps https://angular.io/guide/router vs https://reactrouter.com/en/main

Even adding something that's not there out of the box is pretty much the same, like https://primeng.org/ or https://primereact.org/

React will typically have more fragmentation and therefore also choice, but I don't see those two experiences as that different. Updates and version management/supply chain will inevitably be more of a mess with the library, admittedly.

Now, projects like Next https://nextjs.org/ exist and add what some might regard as the missing pieces and work well if you want something opinionated and with lots of features out of the box, but a lot of those features (like SSR) are actually pretty advanced and not always even necessary.

Official Website: https://primereact.org/

2️⃣ - Original Design: A remarkable feature of Cosmedic Istanbul is that it uses its own original design without being dependent on paid templates. In this way, the look of the website is completely unique to the company and the styling process is greatly simplified with the contributions of open source projects such as PrimeReact and PrimeReact Designer. Thus, a professional look is achieved without having to write pages of CSS code.

I've been using https://primereact.org and so far very impressed by their components and the documentation.

This kind of limitation and my need of ready-to-use UI component drove me away from MUI till I found the answer, PrimeReact.

PrimeReact has numerous form and data components for complex requirements. Greetings from PrimeTek.

Been using PrimeReact with my latest project and I am really happy with the outcome. Lot's of components, well written documentation, and there's even this CSS library that comes with it called PrimeFlex

Tbh, prime-react comes to mind, the component code examples are a mess. I recently used some UI components and as much as I liked them, that was SUCH a peeve to deal with.

Check out PrimeReact. PrimeReact also has a FluentUI theme. Note: I work at PrimeTek.