rbspy VS textual-web

We used rbspy to generate the flamegraph:

You could use rbspy to profile the EventMachine process as it's doing the workload, and try to see there where most of the time is being spent.

Not sure what your issue is and you got some of this info from strace, but FYI rbspy can also help profile where a running Ruby process is spending its time: https://rbspy.github.io/. I think it's a little more helpful than strace in that it should bring it back to Ruby code rather than just showing the raw syscalls.

Even the most general profiler tool will show you each statement's accumulated time. These are called statistical profilers and give you a panoramic view of what the test is doing. An example of such a profiler is rbspy:

As a result, you need to craft a specific routine for each interpreter runtime (in some cases, each version of that runtime) to obtain symbol information. Educated eyes might have already noticed, it's not an easy undertaking considering the sheer amount of interpreted languages out there. For example, a very well known Ruby profiler, rbspy, generates code for reading internal structs of the Ruby runtime for each version.

For production, it depends on what the process is built with. There are possibly better tracing tools than just strace. For example Java has JMX, Go has pprof. There's also things like rbspy for Ruby.

I was a bit surprised to find out that the tool used to generate the flamegraph for Ruby (rbspy [1]) is written in Rust. lol

[1] https://github.com/rbspy/rbspy

Maybe https://github.com/rbspy/rbspy would allow you to profile the running ruby process handling web sockets?

The worst part is there's absolutely nothing stopping anyone for making the same principles work in the browser. Zero. Nada. It's trivially proven by compiling apps to wasm and running in a terminal emulator but there's nothing stopping anyone from building react-terminal-like or whatever except that... I don't even know what since we've got https://github.com/Textualize/textual-web.

People have thrown out decades of UX research and engineering out of the window because it isn't cool anymore. Makes me sick.

This is awesome work and textual being able to support terminal or web (https://github.com/Textualize/textual-web) also gives hope that this can be more than a terminal app. I'm hoping that in the future features like this can be standard in Linux's perf tool, for example, Firefox profiler support was recently added as a Google summer-of-code contribution: https://perf.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Tutorial#Firefox_Prof...

It appears that, by default, the textual-web command makes a WebSocket connection to textualize-dev.io and hosts through that. Unlike regular HTTP which (usually) requires a server, WebSocket is a session-based network protocol that allows for long connections with bidirectional traffic.

Take a look at the repo, because the implementation’s fairly small and the README has more info: https://github.com/Textualize/textual-web