raiblocks
orv-privacy
| raiblocks | orv-privacy | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 3,230 | 18 | |
| - | - | |
| 9.4 | 0.0 | |
| almost 3 years ago | over 4 years ago | |
| C++ | Rust | |
| BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
raiblocks
-
The basics of Nano — why it’s such an exciting crypto
https://github.com/nanocurrency/raiblocks/wiki/Design-featur...
orv-privacy
-
Could you do a fork of Nano, more anonymous? Thanks.
Sure - proposals have been made on how to do this. See for example https://github.com/PlasmaPower/orv-privacy.
-
This is why Nano is the FUTURE !!
Nano not having full privacy is a deliberate choice. Deliberate, because there are ways to implement privacy in Nano on the first layer. See for example CamoBanano or the perhaps even more comprehensive PlasmaPower proposal. Obviously neither of these have been implemented on the first layer of Nano by the Nano Foundation. The reason for this is that the Nano Foundation's goal is to have Nano as broadly adopted as possible. Given the hostility of many governments to full privacy cryptocurrencies, adding privacy does not seem like an ideal move. In that sense it's very simply a practical approach.
-
Any nano privacy options yet?
Also check this out https://github.com/PlasmaPower/orv-privacy
-
The future of privacy on Nano
There's also CamoBanano on Banano though I have no idea what progress is like there, and the perhaps even more comprehensive PlasmaPower proposal.
-
Why you should be bearish about nano point-of-sale
And yes, there's area for improvement. PlasmaPower proposed a nano privacy model wherein balances, at least, are hidden.
-
Could/should Nano implement Confidential Transactions?
Consensus initially seems to be an issue if Nano were to implement this, but a form of it could be made compatible with ORV such as implemented here or described here.
-
Nano, digital cash and privacy
I think it's possible to reveal sums of commitments to determine voting weight. See this implementation: https://github.com/PlasmaPower/orv-privacy
-
Community Questions - Q1 2022
Orv-privacy by Plasmapower would add amount privacy.
- Why I think Nano will never be adopted
-
The basics of Nano — why it’s such an exciting crypto
To be fair, not having privacy in Nano is a choice. We could clone it with privacy, see https://github.com/PlasmaPower/orv-privacy
What are some alternatives?
DAPSCoin - DAPS is the world's first coin to implement Bulletproofs and RingCT & Ring Signatures in a staking chain. With DAPS it is possible to stake, run masternodes and mine PoA blocks.
nano-node - Nano is digital currency. Its ticker is: XNO and its currency symbol is: Ӿ
cpp-algorand-sdk - Unofficial Algorand C++ SDK.
Nault - ⚡ The most advanced Nano wallet with focus on security, speed and robustness
Array - A virtual to physical world value system and vice versa
asmr - Atomic Swaps for Meros and other cryptocurrencies
Megacoin - Welcome to Megacoin MΣC - Around the World!
rsnano-node - RsNano is a Rust port of nano-node
safexcore - reference implementation of Safex Blockchain in C++
bunkercoin - Bunkercoin staging tree
divvyd - The XDV Ledger is a decentralized cryptographic ledger powered by a network of peer-to-peer servers.
nautilus - Feature Rich NANO Wallet