ragas VS stable_diffusion.openvino

congrats on launching! i think my continuing struggle with looking at Ragas as a company rather than an oss library is that the core of it is like 8 metrics (https://github.com/explodinggradients/ragas/tree/main/src/ra...) that are each 1-200 LOC. i can inline that easily in my app and retain full control, or model that in langchain or haystack or whatever.

why is Ragas a library and a company, rather than an overall "standard" or philosophy (eg like Heroku's 12 Factor Apps) that could maybe be more robust?

(just giving an opp to pitch some underappreciated benefits of using this library)

Also, at some point you'll need to get serious about evaluation (trust me, you will). You may be interested in https://github.com/explodinggradients/ragas

The problem becomes worse if you want to inspect outputs from not just one, but several different queries. Luckily, there are several free open source packages such as ragas and DeepEval that can help evaluate your chatbot so you don't have to manually do it 😌

We have build RAGAS framework for this https://github.com/explodinggradients/ragas

Hi u/thecuteturtle, I am building open-source projects for evaluating LLM-based applications. Check it out https://github.com/explodinggradients/ragas and if you like to collaborate let me know :)

it might be the --xformers flag, try getting rid of that since your not using cuda you wouldn't be able to run it with xformers and you could also try --use-cpu all ... you can also check this out .. https://github.com/bes-dev/stable_diffusion.openvino .. it's probably your best option if your using CPU, which if your PC Graphics are using Intel UHD 620 then you don't have a GPU and an optimized CPU inference would be best to run

SD can be run on a CPU without a GPU. I know for certain it can be done with OpenVINO. In fact, on some i7s, it will run at around 3 seconds per iteration. There was a reddit SD thread a while back saying it can be done with Automatic111. Also, soe recent threads on problems with AMD GPUs suggest Automatic1111 is using the CPU rather than the intended GPU. (Fortuanely, I have a GPU, so I don't have to deal with it myself!)

I'm not actually entirely convinced that it's even using the GPU. Radeontop shows 0% utilization while the images are generating. Additionally, the listed iteration speed should be impossibly slow for any GPU; it says 26.58s/it, which is slower than just running on a CPU.

iGPU's are in short not supported. There's this repo that may or may not help you, but even if it did I wouldn't expect much.

You can also run it in windows native with openvino, there is a barebones webui for it as well in one of the forks.Requires setting cpu to gpu in one the files. https://github.com/bes-dev/stable_diffusion.openvino

In https://github.com/bes-dev/stable_diffusion.openvino/blob/master/stable_diffusion_engine.py

" We ended up using three different Stable Diffusion projects for our testing, mostly because no single package worked on every GPU. For Nvidia, we opted for Automatic 1111's webui version(opens in new tab). AMD GPUs were tested using Nod.ai's Shark version(opens in new tab), while for Intel's Arc GPUs we used Stable Diffusion OpenVINO(opens in new tab). "