quickjspp
jsx
quickjspp | jsx | |
---|---|---|
6 | 14 | |
269 | 1,945 | |
- | 0.2% | |
0.0 | 0.0 | |
about 2 years ago | 6 months ago | |
C | HTML | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
quickjspp
-
Alternatives for realtime offline-first JavaScript applications
I think that my Storage implementation that is built-in into JavaScript in QuickJS and Sciter is still unbeatable as an integrated JS Storage solution:
-
Sciter, the 5 MB Electron alternative, has switched to JavaScript
"custom version of React he publishes..."
It is not a a custom version of React but rather extension of DOM model by just these:
1. Native JSX support. In Sciter QuickJS was extended to support JSX literals out of the box: https://github.com/c-smile/quickjspp/blob/master/quickjs-jsx...
2. Native methods:
- Element.patch(...JSX expression...) - native VDOM reconciliation implementation.
-
Txiki.js: Tiny JavaScript runtime built with QuickJS and libuv
In fact 1.8 Mb is quite a lot for QuickJS.
Whole Sciter engine that includes as QuickJS as HTML/CSS engines is about 6 Mb.
My port of QuickJS [1] that also includes persistent storage (think of MongoDB built into JS) is 736 Kb on Windows.
[1] https://github.com/c-smile/quickjspp
-
Mongita is to MongoDB as SQLite is to SQL
I've added built-in persistence to QuickJS: https://github.com/c-smile/quickjspp/blob/master/storage/doc/introduction.md
-
Show HN: Svelte NodeGUI, a lightweight Electron alternative with native UI
I might go a little offtopic here. Any plans to integrate https://github.com/c-smile/quickjspp. That way you can target mobile platforms too. QT supports mobiles well
As for desktop only this is great. Great work. Many people are commenting on NodeGUI only. They have forgotten to mention how Svelte also contribytes to saving memory footprint and cpu cycles over other frameworks with a much easier way to write apps. Add a small learning curve to that.
-
What's new in ECMAScript 2021
I've added JSX to JS used in Sciter that allowed to have JSX available for Mithril and PReact
jsx
-
I am having to pass down 8+ props even for simple components. What are some common ways to mitigate this? (Typescript)
Svelte syntax? Yes, there is upcoming initiative JSX 2.0 which includes shorthands like that. However, have no idea whether it will be released any time soon. So let's say "this is part of React/JSX 1.0" (shrugging)
-
Why TypeScript is the better JavaScript
Inherent support for JSX in the language itself
-
Node.js やReact、ESM、Viteの説明
JavaScript + HTML(DOM)= JSX
-
Alpine.js
FWIW, the className prop is a React thing not a JSX thing. Other libraries which use JSX will happily accept a plain class prop. The React limitation is abstraction leakage: props are not attributes, they map to DOM properties.
But to the point that JSX is a DSL, that limitation is specifically because React itself is very tightly coupled to DOM semantics… but JSX explicitly has no built in semantics[1].
1: First sentence of https://facebook.github.io/jsx/ - “JSX is an XML-like syntax extension to ECMAScript without any defined semantics.”
-
React - Introducing JSX
JSX stands for 'JavaScript XML' and is a syntax extension for JavaScript. It is used to create DOM elements that are then rendered in the React DOM. Although it looks like HTML, it is actually an XML-like syntax specifically written for use in React. Interestingly, JSX is not valid JavaScript either. JSX needs to be compiled by a tool like Babel to be translated into regular JavaScript that a browser can understand. Put simply, JSX describes what the UI should look like, and React takes care of properly rendering it.
- Web lagnunages to learn
-
My thoughts on Mithril.js
Alternatively, you can use JSX syntax (like with React), but then you need build-tools.
-
Incrementally adopting TypeScript in a create-react-app project
Note: For React component files (JSX) we'll use .tsx to maintain JSX support and for non React files we'll use the .ts file extension. However, if you want you could still use .ts file extension for React components without any problem.
-
Sciter, the 5 MB Electron alternative, has switched to JavaScript
I’m concerned that you’re falling into the same trap here with integrating your own variant of JSX, and mulling over adding more things like hyphens in unquoted object literal keys.
JSX is popular enough that it’s safe, ECMAScript isn’t going to break it, but your alterations to JSX are already significantly incompatible: you have being equivalent to JSX("input", {"class": "search"}, null), but the JSX everyone else is using has that equivalent to JSX(input.search, {}, null). I’m not certain if your JSX syntax is supposed to be able to be used with React code or anything else that uses JSX syntax, but if yes then it’ll be broken in a significant number of cases so that it’s worse than useless, and if no, well, it’s going to be misleading, and what if JSX did get merged into ECMAScript in some form? Then you’d be incompatible with ECMAScript again.
Same deal with hyphens in unquoted object literal keys: it’s not part of ECMAScript now, but just because it’d be a syntax error now doesn’t mean it always will be. Decorators in TypeScript are a good example of things going badly wrong even when an extremely popular project is involved.
I say: if you want to go JavaScript, go JavaScript, maaaaaybe plus standard JSX conforming with <https://facebook.github.io/jsx/>, and no further. Even if what you do is obviously superior, &c. &c. I’d apply the same reasoning on your fork of CSS: you introduced it for a good reason back then, but now it’s just friction, even if it’s a little better in a vacuum (and maybe it is in parts, maybe it isn’t in other parts).
-
Do you think HTML is a programming language
Then it might be time for a pull request which identifies these parts as JSX.
What are some alternatives?
hermes - A JavaScript engine optimized for running React Native.
htm - Hyperscript Tagged Markup: JSX alternative using standard tagged templates, with compiler support.
jerryscript - Ultra-lightweight JavaScript engine for the Internet of Things.
React - The library for web and native user interfaces.
svelte-nodegui - Build performant, native and cross-platform desktop applications with native Svelte + powerful CSS-like styling.🚀
joystick - A full-stack JavaScript framework for building stable, easy-to-maintain apps and websites.
v8-jsi - React Native V8 JSI adapter
denoflare - Develop, test, and deploy Cloudflare Workers with Deno.
just - the only javascript runtime to hit no.1 on techempower :fire:
prepack - A JavaScript bundle optimizer.
sciter-js-sdk - Sciter.JS - Sciter but with QuickJS on board instead of my TIScript
vite - Next generation frontend tooling. It's fast!