quarto-cli VS github-orgmode-tests

Hello, I have a rather specific question.

I want to write a detailed tutorial (as HTML page) and a condensed version of it (as Reveal JS slides) from a single document.

I have found this suggestion[1] to specify the separate output file name for the slides in the header, and `quarto render myfile.qmd` will generate both.

Is there a way to include content (long form text, code, or images) that will only be exported in the HTML page but not in the slides (where space is more limited)?

[1] https://github.com/quarto-dev/quarto-cli/discussions/1751

❯ docker build -t cavo789/quarto . [+] Building 208.2s (13/13) FINISHED docker:default => [internal] load .dockerignore 0.0s => => transferring context: 2B 0.0s => [internal] load build definition from Dockerfile 0.0s => => transferring dockerfile: 2.08kB 0.0s => [internal] load metadata for docker.io/eddelbuettel/r2u:20.04 3.4s => CACHED [ 1/10] FROM docker.io/eddelbuettel/r2u:20.04@sha256:133b40653e0ad564d348f94ad72c753b97fb28941c072e69bb6e03c3b8d6c06e 0.0s => [ 2/10] RUN set -e -x && apt-get update && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends pandoc pandoc-citeproc curl gdebi-core librsvg2-bin python3.8 47.6s => [ 3/10] RUN set -e -x && install.r shiny jsonlite ggplot2 htmltools remotes renv knitr rmarkdown quarto 27.2s => [ 4/10] RUN set -e -x && curl -o quarto-linux-amd64.deb -L https://github.com/quarto-dev/quarto-cli/releases/download/v1.4.529/quarto-1.4.529-linux-amd64.deb && gdebi - 12.1s => [ 5/10] RUN set -e -x && groupadd -g 1000 -o "quarto" && useradd -m -u 1000 -g 1000 -o -s /bin/bash "quarto" 0.5s => [ 6/10] RUN set -e -x && quarto install tool tinytex --update-path 23.0s => [ 7/10] RUN set -e -x && printf "\e[0;105m%s\e[0;0m\n" "Run tlmgr update" && ~/.TinyTeX/bin/x86_64-linux/tlmgr update --self --all && ~/.TinyTeX/bin/x86_64-linux/fm 77.9s => [ 8/10] RUN set -e -x && printf "\e[0;105m%s\e[0;0m\n" "Run tlmgr install for a few tinyText packages (needed for PDF conversion)" && ~/.TinyTeX/bin/x86_64-linux/tlmgr 11.7s => [ 9/10] RUN set -e -x && mkdir -p /input 0.5s => exporting to image 4.0s => => exporting layers 4.0s => => writing image sha256:fe1d20bd71a66eb574ba1f5b35c988ace57c2c30f93159caa4d5de2f8c490eb0 0.0s => => naming to docker.io/cavo789/quarto 0.0s What's Next? View summary of image vulnerabilities and recommendations → docker scout quickview

I had some trouble following this but I think what you're saying is the ` [@Bernhofer2021.02.23.432527]` tag isn't getting converted to the actual bib reference - is that right? I just copied this into my system and I could make that part work fine - using my own .bib file of course, and I used this csl which I copied locally. The one change I made to the setup was to put both the .bib and the .csl file in my working directory where the .qmd file is, and also as I commented on a different post of yours from the other day, I make sure there's no spaces in the path to my working directory (for either the folder names or the filenames). So for me, everything is in C:\Users\xxxx\workingdir - this is due to a known RStudio issue with spaces. Who knows if that's what you're running into or not.

You should ask in the Quarto discussion group on their GitHub. They are extremely reactive if you can give a MWE.

- or to visualize and use it as a personal partner.

There's already a ton of open-source UIs such as Chatbot-ui[3] and Reor[4]. And that's just the tip of the iceberg.

Personally, I haven't been consistent enough through the years in note-taking.

So, I'm really curious to learn more about those of you who were and implemented such pipelines.

I'm sure there's a ton of really fascinating experiences.

[1] https://orgmode.org/

literate config (using ORG mode)

Obligatory reference to Emacs Org-Mode [1].

Author's approach is basically Org-Mode with fewer helpers.

Org-mode's power is that, at core, it's just a text file, with gradual augmentation.

Then again, Org-Mode is a tool you must install, accessible through a limited list of clients (Emacs obviously, but also VSCode), and the power of OP's approach is that it requires no external tools.

[1] https://orgmode.org

This reminds me a lot of [Org Mode](https://orgmode.org/). Do you have plans to add other org-like features, like evaluating code blocks? I don't personally see myself moving away from org-mode, but it would be nice to have something to recommend to people who are reluctant to use emacs, even if it's only for a single application.

If you want to spare a couple of detours, you probably could start with Emacs Org-mode according to Greenspun's eleventh rule: "Any sufficiently complicated PIM or note-taking program contains an ad hoc, informally specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of Org mode."

Wow, no one has recommended Org mode (https://orgmode.org). I started using Emacs nearly 20 years ago specifically because of Org. I use Org for all my static sites, note taking, to-do lists and calendar. Org has a lightweight markup language that has far more features than Markdown (e.g., plain text spreadsheets!), but the markup isn't visible to the extent that Markdown is in most editors. Emacs with Org files behaves almost like a WYSIWYG editor. For example, links in Org files are clickable and their URLs aren't visible unless a cursor is hovered over them. I'm an obsessive note-taker with more than 6,000 Org files in my personal knowledge base and none of the dozens of other note-taking apps that I've evaluated comes even close to Emacs with Org. But to be fair, I create content on Linux only so support for mobile devices doesn't matter to me.

By the way, I think it's hilarious that you mentioned Dreamweaver, dv35z, because I experimented with using Dreamweaver for note-taking in the 90s! I still have a few HTML files that include notes I took back then using Dreamweaver. Needless to say, I definitely prefer Emacs with Org!

Just another reason for one to get into org-mode[1] and org-roam[2].

Combine this with the concept of Zettelkasten[3] and you have a wonderful way to organize and store all your notes and writings, and even a way to know at what point you should move your idea from analog to digital (based on it's maturity, e.g. "evergreen state").

1. https://orgmode.org/