quarter VS apertium

I am working on a personal time-tracker where I try to make it as effortless as possible to keep track of what activities you spend time on.

Rationale, as a consultant I am often required to use multiple time-tracking software, all made for accountants, all terrible to use. I made this little web application where I can track my daily activities and at the end of the week transfer the result to whatever system needed.

The desktop is the most polished mode, mobile is functional but I mostly use if for viewing.

It's open source, the hosted version has open registrations given a GitHub or GMail account.

I would appreciate feedback on basically anything. I have been using the same system (during many different rewrites) for years so I am pretty blind to what needs improvement.

https://github.com/eliasson/quarter

https://quarterapp.com/

Thanks!

I have this hobby project for personal time tracking I work on from time to time. It's usable enough for my daily use so motivation has dropped since that point.

https://github.com/eliasson/quarter

I've used QuarterApp for personal time tracking. Not sure if it has grouping features though: https://github.com/eliasson/quarter

It has now reached a point where I think it could be of use or interest for others. You can find it here if you're interested https://github.com/eliasson/quarter

This is very cool, looking forward to it! I've been doing the same thing with Spanish Wikipedia articles for a while, using a few lines of Bash + Regex. I was using Apertium for it. https://apertium.org/ It's definitely worse than most ML-based solutions, but it works reliably and fast; you can run it entirely offline. With Spanish translations, the main problem I was facing is lack of vocabulary, so I created https://github.com/phil294/apertium-eng-spa-wiktionary which about doubles the amount of recognized words, albeit with wonky grammar.

I used to keep track of the state of machine translation some years back.

I think the way you measure the success of an automated translation is edit distance, i.e. how many manual edits you need to make to a translated text before you reach some acceptable state. I suppose it's somewhat subjective, but it is possible to construct a benchmark and allow for multiple correct results.

The best resources I knew back then were:

VISL's CG-3 self-reported a competitively low edit distance compared to Google Translate: https://visl.sdu.dk/constraint_grammar.html -- the abstraction unfortunately requires a rather deep knowledge of any one particular language's grammar. It is a convincing argument that in order to beat Google Translate, you want less fuzzy machine learning and more structural analysis. But you also need a PhD in computational linguistics and deep knowledge of each language.

Apertium has an open-source pipeline: https://apertium.org/ -- seems to be much more like an open-source approach with a quality similar to Google Translate (although I don't know if it's better or worse; probably slightly worse in most cases, and with a slightly lower coverage).

For context, I have been contributing CV Creole data to Unicode's CLDR and MediaWiki for a number of years now, but both are mostly manual work. I once considered setting up an Apertium language pair between CV Creole and Portuguese, given the grammatical similarities, but never got around to it.

Lingva is awesome. Also don't forget to check out LibreTranslate and Apertium. They are open source. Apertium can even translate web pages (you need to enter the URL).

#!/bin/bash set -x mkdir -p apertium-src && \ mkdir -p $MTDIR cd apertium-src && \ wget http://ftp.tsukuba.wide.ad.jp/software/gcc/releases/gcc-8.5.0/gcc-8.5.0.tar.gz -O - \ | gzip -dc \ | tar -xf - && \ cd gcc-8.5.0 && \ ./configure --prefix=$MTDIR --disable-multilib && \ make -j $(nproc) && \ make install && \ cd .. || exit 1 cd apertium-src && \ wget https://github.com/unicode-org/icu/releases/download/release-69-1/icu4c-69_1-src.tgz -O - \ | gzip -dc \ | tar -xf - \ && cd icu/source \ && CC=gcc CXX=g++ ./configure --prefix=$MTDIR \ && CC=gcc CXX=g++ make -j $(nproc) \ && CC=gcc CXX=g++ make install \ && cd ../.. \ || exit 1 cd apertium-src && \ svn checkout http://beta.visl.sdu.dk/svn/visl/tools/vislcg3/trunk vislcg3 && \ cd vislcg3 && ./get-boost.sh \ && ./cmake.sh -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=$MTDIR \ -DICU_INCLUDE_DIR=$MTDIR/include \ -DICU_LIBRARY=$MTDIR/lib/libicuuc.so \ -DICU_IO_LIBRARY=$MTDIR/lib/libicuio.so \ -DICU_I18N_LIBRARY=$MTDIR/lib/libicui18n.so \ && make -j$(nproc) && \ make install && cd .. || exit 1 cd apertium-src && \ git clone https://github.com/apertium/lttoolbox && \ cd lttoolbox && ./autogen.sh --prefix=$MTDIR && make -j $(nproc) && make install && cd ../.. || exit 1 cd apertium-src && \ git clone https://github.com/apertium/apertium && \ cd apertium && ./autogen.sh --prefix=$MTDIR && make -j $(nproc) && make install && cd ../.. || exit 1 cd apertium-src && \ git clone https://github.com/apertium/apertium-lex-tools && \ cd apertium-lex-tools && ./autogen.sh --prefix=$MTDIR && make -j $(nproc) && make install && cd ../.. || exit 1 cd apertium-src && \ git clone https://github.com/apertium/apertium-tha && \ cd apertium-tha && ./autogen.sh --prefix=$MTDIR && make && make install && cd ../.. || exit 1 cd apertium-src && \ git clone https://github.com/apertium/apertium-tha-eng && \ cd apertium-tha-eng && ./autogen.sh --prefix=$MTDIR && make && make install && cd .. && \ cd .. || exit 1