ql-https
cling
Our great sponsors
ql-https | cling | |
---|---|---|
6 | 19 | |
16 | 3,342 | |
- | 2.1% | |
7.7 | 8.4 | |
about 2 months ago | 17 days ago | |
Common Lisp | C++ | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
ql-https
-
It's 2023, so of course I'm learning Common Lisp
Solutions for the lack of https:
- add in https://github.com/rudolfochrist/ql-https (downloads packages with curl)
- use another package manager, CLPM: https://www.clpm.dev (or the newest ocicl)
> CLPM comes as a pre-built binary, supports HTTPS by default, supports installing multiple package versions, supports versioned systems, and more.
- use mitmproxy: https://hiphish.github.io/blog/2022/03/19/securing-quicklisp...
-
Ocicl – An ASDF system distribution and management tool for Common Lisp
Other options are:
- Quicklisp -really slick, libraries in there are curated. (with https support here: https://github.com/rudolfochrist/ql-https and here: https://github.com/snmsts/quicklisp-https.git)
- for project-local dependencies like virtualenv: https://github.com/fukamachi/qlot
- a new, more traditional one: https://www.clpm.dev (CLPM comes as a pre-built binary, supports HTTPS by default, supports installing multiple package versions, supports versioned systems, and more)
For recent Quicklisp upgrades: http://ultralisp.org/
Ocicl is very new (5 days) and tries a new approach, building "on tools from the world of containers".
-
What do you think the risks/pitfalls of using Common Lisp are in a business?
You can use SSL with QuickLisp via ql-https
- quicklisp security (or total lack of it)
-
Common Lisp Implementations in 2023
LPM's warning is not surprising. It's common for libraries (dare I say open-source ones?), even if they work well. It's part of the stability game, once they are marked 1.0, they are stable. LPM works well (as reported by others).
QL wants to do it portably, there are easy workarounds, but yeah…
(just saw https://github.com/rudolfochrist/ql-https)
-
Securing Quicklisp through mitmproxy
That what I‘m doing: https://github.com/rudolfochrist/ql-https
cling
- Cling 1.0 Released
- Cling: Interactive C++ Interpreter
-
Interactive GCC (igcc) is a read-eval-print loop (REPL) for C/C++
More recent activity, but based on clang: https://github.com/jupyter-xeus/xeus-cling https://github.com/root-project/cling
-
It's 2023, so of course I'm learning Common Lisp
> The repl driven workflow is amazing and the lisp images are rock solid and highly performant.
do people not realize that basically everything vm/interpreted language has a repl these days?
https://www.digitalocean.com/community/tutorials/java-repl-j...
https://github.com/waf/CSharpRepl
https://pub.dev/packages/interactive
not to mention ruby, python, php, lua
hell even c++ has a janky repl https://github.com/root-project/cling
-
Compiled and Interpreted Languages: Two Ways of Saying Tomato
Interactive C++ with Cling, https://blog.llvm.org/posts/2020-11-30-interactive-cpp-with-cling/, https://github.com/root-project/cling/, Relaxing the One Definition Rule in Interpreted C++, https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3377555.3377901 (PDF: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339463915_Relaxing_the_one_definition_rule_in_interpreted_C)
-
dont want online ones
Want to see your mind blown? Check out cling, a (sort of) C and C++ interpreter (it's a REPL). Or the work in progress, live-developed clauf, a real C interpreter.
-
How to cling for execute code plugin?
Cling: https://github.com/root-project/cling
-
Do you use Wokwi to test/simulate/debug your ESP32/Arduino code, or are there other dev tools a better fit for the ESP32?
Wanting to just test pure c or c++ functions that are hardware independent -> (solution that I'm using): cling just in time compiler, gives a shell that you can just experiment with C++ expressions
-
gcc is pre installed but g++ not?
C++ source cannot contain a shebang, but you can make them executable with binfmt-misc, and have the kernel pass them to a C++ interpreter such as Cling upon execution. Pretty much the same as running Python or Bash scripts.
- Fête à bord d’un avion de Sunwing | L’organisateur s’explique sur l’origine de sa fortune
What are some alternatives?
CSharpRepl - A command line C# REPL with syntax highlighting – explore the language, libraries and nuget packages interactively.
termux-ndk - android-ndk for termux
tungsten - A Common Lisp toolkit.
xeus-cling - Jupyter kernel for the C++ programming language
bettercap - The Swiss Army knife for 802.11, BLE, IPv4 and IPv6 networks reconnaissance and MITM attacks.
femtolisp - a lightweight, robust, scheme-like lisp implementation
alive - Common Lisp Extension for VSCode
cppreference-doc - C++ standard library reference
thirteen-letters - Competitive word scramble in the browser, made for Lisp Game Jam (Spring 2023)
sectorlisp - Bootstrapping LISP in a Boot Sector
quicklisp-https
foth - Tutorial-style FORTH implementation written in golang