pytest-recording
A pytest plugin that allows recording network interactions via VCR.py (by kiwicom)
responses
A utility for mocking out the Python Requests library. (by getsentry)
| pytest-recording | responses | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 381 | 4,042 | |
| 4.5% | 0.6% | |
| 6.7 | 8.0 | |
| 21 days ago | 3 months ago | |
| Python | Python | |
| MIT License | Apache License 2.0 |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
pytest-recording
Posts with mentions or reviews of pytest-recording.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-03-16.
-
Two Methods for Testing HTTPS API Calls with Python and pytest and also Communicating with the In-laws
An alternate approach involves using VCR.py, a tool that records HTTP interactions in YAML files, then intercepts future HTTP requests and plays back the recorded responses. In this tutorial, we will use pytest-vcr to interface with VCR.py, although pytest-recording is another good option for doing the same.
responses
Posts with mentions or reviews of responses.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-05-16.
- Please recommend a good API Mocking tool
-
Useful libraries for integration/api testing
I use responses for this (for HTTP/HTTPS requests), to great affect. It's API is very nice. We have an API layer at work that's basically just a proxy to micro services, and responses is what we use to test it.
-
How I start every new Python backend API project
responses
-
Mocking api request?
Please format your code appropriately. But if you are using python requests you can use responses for mocking requests: https://github.com/getsentry/responses
- We Just Gave $260,028 to Open Source Maintainers
-
best way to test requests and responses in pytest?
You can use this https://github.com/getsentry/responses
- What's the use case for Responses library?
-
Am new to Testing, Should I test Functions that Return a Queryset?
The repsonses library is designed for mocking requests during tests https://github.com/getsentry/responses
-
Testing for API data (python)
I like using responses for mocking API calls in unit tests. It's easy to use and has less boilerplate than doing the mocks yourself. The bulk of your unit tests should be around any data transformation you do, and unit testing them should be fairly straightforward. I'd recommend writing integration tests as well, especially as IME the most common reason why data pipelines with API sources break is due to breaking API changes out of your control. I'd make them as high level as possible and make real API calls, preferably using credentials for a designated testing account. Assert the response from the API call conforms to the contract you expect. Additionally to integration test your code, you can test the main entrypoint to your script and make sure it spits out a file with the shape and contents you expect.
-
Two Methods for Testing HTTPS API Calls with Python and pytest and also Communicating with the In-laws
HTTP client library flexibility. Yes, requests pairs well with responses or requests-mock, and HTTPX has RESPX or pytest_httpx. Those testing helpers are an excellent match for the corresponding library, and should certainly be recommended. However, I don't always want to face the risk of rewriting all my tests if I replace the client library some day. And sometimes I am using an altogether different tool (even though both requests and HTTPX are quite awesome) such as urlopen, urllib3, httplib2, tornado, or aiohttp.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing pytest-recording and responses you can also consider the following projects:
Schemathesis - Automate your API Testing: catch crashes, validate specs, and save time
httpretty - Intercept HTTP requests at the Python socket level. Fakes the whole socket module
betamax - A VCR imitation designed only for python-requests.
VCR.py - Automatically mock your HTTP interactions to simplify and speed up testing
tavern - A command-line tool and Python library and Pytest plugin for automated testing of RESTful APIs, with a simple, concise and flexible YAML-based syntax
httmock - A mocking library for requests
Selenium Wire - Extends Selenium's Python bindings to give you the ability to inspect requests made by the browser.
pytest-flask-sqlalchemy - A pytest plugin for preserving test isolation in Flask-SQLAlchemy using database transactions.
Moto - A library that allows you to easily mock out tests based on AWS infrastructure.
openverse-catalog - Identifies and collects data on cc-licensed content across web crawl data and public apis.
mock - The Python mock library
pytest-recording vs Schemathesis
responses vs httpretty
pytest-recording vs betamax
responses vs VCR.py
pytest-recording vs tavern
responses vs httmock
pytest-recording vs VCR.py
responses vs Selenium Wire
pytest-recording vs pytest-flask-sqlalchemy
responses vs Moto
pytest-recording vs openverse-catalog
responses vs mock