pyparsing VS parser

Compare pyparsing vs parser and see what are their differences.

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
pyparsing parser
13 4
2,100 5
1.4% -
8.3 7.7
about 1 month ago 23 days ago
Python TypeScript
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

pyparsing

Posts with mentions or reviews of pyparsing. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-08-24.

parser

Posts with mentions or reviews of parser. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-08-04.
  • Ramda: A practical functional library for JavaScript programmers
    7 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 4 Aug 2023
    I find straight forward, dedicated combinators much more readable and practical to use ie. for iterables (context where it makes a lot of sense) [0] example [1], runtime assertions (through refutations, which are much faster than combinators over assertions) [2], parser combinators for smallish grammars [3] etc.

    In many cases vanilla/imperative js is more readable and terse, no need to bring functional fanaticism everywhere, just in places where it gives true benefits and in form that can be understood by peers.

    Functional code can be beautiful and can also be unreadable/undebugable. Same with imperative code. It's great in js/ts you can pick approach where the problem is expressed more naturally and mix it at will.

    [0] https://github.com/preludejs/generator

    [1] https://observablehq.com/@mirek/project-euler

    [2] https://github.com/preludejs/refute

    [3] https://github.com/preludejs/parser

  • Parsing Text with Nom
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 12 Jan 2022
    Parser combinators are great, we're using parser combinators in production, they are great ie. for typescript [0].

    [0] https://github.com/preludejs/parser

  • Parser Combinators in Haskell
    10 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 22 Dec 2021
  • Casual Parsing in JavaScript
    5 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 19 Aug 2021

What are some alternatives?

When comparing pyparsing and parser you can also consider the following projects:

parsita - The easiest way to parse text in Python

instaparse

iregex - A way to write regex with objects instead of strings.

assert-combinators - Functional assertion combinators.

attoparsec - A fast Haskell library for parsing ByteStrings

three-pass-compiler - Solution to the Three Pass Compiler kata on CodeWars, parsing and manipulating a very simple AST

sly - Sly Lex Yacc

parser-combinators - Parser combinators.

Lark - Lark is a parsing toolkit for Python, built with a focus on ergonomics, performance and modularity.

angstrom - Parser combinators built for speed and memory efficiency

httpaf - A high performance, memory efficient, and scalable web server written in OCaml