py2js
refactor
py2js | refactor | |
---|---|---|
1 | 7 | |
3 | 435 | |
- | - | |
2.7 | 0.0 | |
almost 3 years ago | 4 months ago | |
Python | Python | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 only | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
py2js
-
Show HN: Python Source Code Refactoring Toolkit via AST
Nice! I like the syntax, this reminds me of the structural search and replace feature from IntelliJ IDEA. Is this the project you were referring to?
https://github.com/erezsh/py2js
refactor
- Refactor: Python Refactoring tool at the AST level
- GitHub - isidentical/refactor: Simple python source refactoring toolkit based on AST
-
Show HN: Python Source Code Refactoring Toolkit via AST
Indeed! I also would suggest people to use a CST implementation (parso / LibCST) instead of refactor if they intend do large scale refactors, but from what I can see in my previous attempts (e.g teyit, a unittest assertion formatter) when you deal with small code fragments (a single expression, or a small statement) then you generally don't need to worry much about the style. The only concern is the literals (especially strings, which there are a few different variations of the same AST) where you could resurrect them back from the token stream (which the CustomUnparser representative in refactor allows).
The real start point for this project was to find / replace all type()'s in CPython codebase with type(type()) (e.g type('') would become type(str)) which is very light weight transformation, and I was able to write a script which did it without having any major problems about style on over 2000 files. Here it is for the reference: https://github.com/isidentical/refactor/blob/master/examples...
Also one thing to note here is that; in the last couple of years, thanks to black (and yapf), the adoptance of code formatters have really increased which is very nice for custom refactoring tools like refactor since the end-code would be refactored anyways so that means if you convert a multi line call, or a list to a single line version then the formatter you use probably reformat that segment anyways.
But thanks for authoring Bowler! It is a very cool project.
- Simple python source refactoring toolkit based on AST
-
refactor: AST based source code refactoring for Python
I've just released 0.2.0 version of refactor, https://github.com/isidentical/refactor, which features additional information collection from the surrounding code.
- AST based source refactoring toolkit
What are some alternatives?
hpy - HPy: a better API for Python
Bowler - Safe code refactoring for modern Python.
semgrep - Lightweight static analysis for many languages. Find bug variants with patterns that look like source code.
prefactor - Tool for writing Python refactorings
prosodia - Parse Backus-Naur form syntaxs into parsers to generate ASTs of arbitrary syntaxs.
Rope - a python refactoring library