pwnat VS masscan

you are correct it has been a while since my starlink was active but check this out it sounds like a possible solution although a small vps with a tunnel would also work but this seems to be serverless http://samy.pl/pwnat/

Here is another method to study https://github.com/samyk/pwnat

You can try this... https://samy.pl/pwnat/ not sure if it handles double nat, which is common these days, but might be worth trying.

maybe check out http://samy.pl/pwnat/

I remember when I was a kid using Moxie Marlinspike's SSLStrip to mitm some friends, not to mention setting up pwnat so I could connect back to my home computer from a linux computer at school. https://samy.pl/pwnat/

Can I get banned for mass scanning with https://github.com/robertdavidgraham/masscan or does it slow down any other vms from other persons?

Nope, this doesn't work any more. Shodan checks all ports (so any attackers using data from Shodan already know which ports you have open), and tools like masscan (https://github.com/robertdavidgraham/masscan) let you portscan the entire IPv4 address space in less than 10 minutes.

https://github.com/LogoiLab/mcsl https://github.com/robertdavidgraham/masscan

Changing the default port does nothing for security. It only prevents some basic brute force or default password scripts. Anyone is able to scan for it in no time anyway (https://github.com/robertdavidgraham/masscan).

But it should blow away the far-too-common belief that no-one's after you because you're not interesting enough. IPv4 is smaller than we think. It is not difficult to scan the entire ipv4 space in minutes. And every single one of those is going to knock your door on the way past.

I'm not sure about the article, but the blazingly-fast IP scanner sounds a lot like Masscan. It can scan the entire Internet in 5 minutes and has received a lot of press: https://github.com/robertdavidgraham/masscan . https://rushter.com/blog/how-masscan-works/ is one of many articles about it.

Here's an except from the masscan docs: