purescript VS purescript-elmish

Naturally I’d recommend using a better language such as ReScript or Elm or PureScript or F#‘s Fable + Elmish, but “React” is the king right now and people perceive TypeScript as “less risky” for jobs/hiring, so here we are.

Unless you want to switch to https://www.purescript.org/.

PureScript[1][2] seems pretty alive these days. From my relatively small, self-contained experiments, it's a lot more flexible and expressive than Elm at the expense of (maybe?) being a bit harder to learn up-front.

[1]: https://www.purescript.org/

[2]:https://github.com/purescript/purescript

*cough* I mean Purescript.

Assuming this is a PS knock, fwiw this went away a good bit ago: https://github.com/purescript/purescript/releases/tag/v0.14.2

There's Purescript with two libraries implementing the Elm architecture, flame and elmish (on React). Purescript only targets JS, but that can be embedded in mobile and desktop apps.

i agree, Elm gets you from "here's the language" to "ok, now here's a site" much faster, in both the docs and the language architecture.

purescript does have some options to model the elm architecture, though, for example: https://github.com/collegevine/purescript-elmish