purescript-tecton VS spago

Compare purescript-tecton vs spago and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
purescript-tecton spago
1 2
38 763
- 1.8%
7.9 8.9
7 months ago 4 days ago
PureScript PureScript
MIT License BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

purescript-tecton

Posts with mentions or reviews of purescript-tecton. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.
  • Tecton: CSS in PureScript
    1 project | /r/purescript | 21 Oct 2022
    I recently released Tecton, a new DSL for authoring CSS. My goal for this project is to make "CSS in PureScript" more practical for real-world use cases, meaning: * Extensive type-level validation * Minimal syntactic overhead * Broad CSS coverage * Alignment with W3C specifications * Exhaustive testing

spago

Posts with mentions or reviews of spago. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-01-24.
  • How is the correct instance being selected here? Why is there no problem with ambiguity?
    1 project | /r/purescript | 9 Aug 2021
    But then I'm also able to spago build my project and I get "[info] Build succeeded." (though it does complain I'm missing some dependencies, but I think that's unrelated) and according to the spago readme, that command is "just a thin layer above the PureScript compiler command purs compile".
  • In Search of the Best Functional Programming Back-End: 2021 Update
    4 projects | dev.to | 24 Jan 2021
    The original draw here was that I’d get Haskell powers, but could utilize the same CICD pipelines for Node.js. However, even with the wonderful JavaScript FP community creating easier to use libraries, EXACT same problems as Haskell. Ajax is hard, and I can’t install packages using Spago because of SSL rewrites breaking the installer.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing purescript-tecton and spago you can also consider the following projects:

cube-composer - A puzzle game inspired by functional programming

package-sets - PureScript packages for Spago and Psc-Package

Transity - Keep track of your πŸ’΅, πŸ•˜, πŸ–, πŸ„, 🍻 on your command line with the plain text accounting tool of the future! πŸš€

purr - [wip] a programming environment for collaboration

purescript-halogen-realworld - Exemplary real world application built with PureScript + Halogen

cachix - Command line client for Nix binary cache hosting:

insect - High precision scientific calculator with support for physical units

dhall-to-cabal - Compile Dhall expressions to Cabal files

purescript-jordans-reference - Learn PureScript with this "clone and play" repository

elm-library-installer - Installs Elm libraries in corporate networks.

purescript-flame - Fast & simple framework for building web applications

zephyr - Tree shaking breeze for PureScript CoreFn AST