proxyquire VS Nightmare

Take a look at proxyquire: https://www.npmjs.com/package/proxyquire - they do some fancy magic to allow you to stub es module imports.

Now that we know how to call/execute a lambda function in our local. Let us learn about mocking the dependencies inside the lambda function. These dependencies can be any third-party libraries or DB call or even an API call. To override and mock these dependencies we can use proxyquire package.

I have been wary of this from when it first came about with rewire and similar libraries. As time has gone on my opinion has only strengthened, and with jest actively embracing mocking modules, I feel like nobody has even bothered to make a counter argument.

If you move foo to a different file and use something like proxyquire, you can override the require from that file to foo.js and sub in something else in the test.

Nightmare JS is a web automation library designed for websites that don’t own APIs and want to automate browsing tasks. Nightmare JS is mostly used by developers for UI testing and crawling. It can also help mimic user actions(like goto, type, and click) with an API that feels synchronous for each block of scripting.

If you want to make your own custom solution, i recommend looking into puppeteer or nightmare. They are browser automation tools that can do this kind of work.

install any end to end testing system, such as playwright, puppeteer, or nightmare

- https://open.segment.com

come effettuare il logout tramite script. Immagino si tratti di inviare un form con nome utente e password, in tal caso con strumenti come https://github.com/segmentio/nightmare#examples dovresti riuscire con facilità

Depends on the use-case. If you want to save complete websites for offline usage I've created [telescopy](https://www.npmjs.com/package/telescopy) for that. If you need to extract content from one html-page then try something like [nightmare.js](https://github.com/segmentio/nightmare)