protondb-evalute VS ProtonDB-for-Steam

Here are some numbers I've extracted from ProtonDB:

About a year ago I've written a custom set of scripts to parse the public data from ProtonDB locally generating visual graphs to see how relative progress is moving. Today I updated the graphs again which I didn't since February and the launch of the Steam Deck made quite an impact in the ratings.

Here is the source for the numbers: https://gitlab.com/TheJackiMonster/protondb-evalute (I wrote a little Python script some time ago. ^^)

From statistics we can actually expect to have similar compatibility across all the Linux distributions. ProtonDB states that from all reported/tested games, about 66% is recommended by at least one to be playable. The amount of playable and verified games (the sum of both) by Valve is also about 66% of their tested games. When you rank all reports on ProtonDB with a sensible metric, you will also get about 66% reported as playable (I have actually written a Python script to do just that).

You can check it out here: https://gitlab.com/TheJackiMonster/protondb-evalute

The number is definitely accurate. I have written a script in the past to evaluate the protondb-data which is publicly available at Github. The script will categorize newer reports into the old categories and provides an overall category from the most given one by all reports to a specific game.

Wine/Proton will definitely improve. We are currently at about 62% (I checked via this tool) compatibility overall. So guessing it will increase to about 70% (even without working anti-cheat) is a good estimate.

yeah, if you check the github page of my extension (https://github.com/qequ/ProtonDB-for-Steam) you can see it's a fork from the Tryton's extension ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) I think of my extension as a complement to the Tryton's one, it shows some more info, but the extension made by Tryton is superb