proposal-types-as-comments
ECMAScript proposal for type syntax that is erased - Stage 1 [Moved to: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-type-annotations] (by giltayar)
flow
Adds static typing to JavaScript to improve developer productivity and code quality. (by facebook)
Our great sponsors
| proposal-types-as-comments | flow | |
|---|---|---|
| 32 | 8 | |
| 2,364 | 22,078 | |
| - | 0.2% | |
| 8.6 | 10.0 | |
| about 2 years ago | 7 days ago | |
| JavaScript | OCaml | |
| - | MIT License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
proposal-types-as-comments
Posts with mentions or reviews of proposal-types-as-comments.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-03-23.
- Proposal-Types-As-Comments - ECMAScript proposal: Types as Comments
-
Thoughts on proposal For Type Syntax in JavaScript
As per the proposal:
- Amazon Corretto 18 is now generally available
- A few misconceptions people seem to have about the Types as Comments proposal
-
[AskJS] Why not just add 'application/typescript' support for browsers.
Not runtime ones. https://github.com/giltayar/proposal-types-as-comments/issues/45
- [AskJS] What features do you think this proposal is missing vs the current typescript state?
-
Deno Is Webby
I do wonder about a future where JavaScript gets non-enforced optional type annotation syntax[1] which is and if said syntax will be slightly incompatible with TypeScript. That would be a little awkward for Deno, wouldn’t it. However I hope that if JS gets type annotation syntax that it would be a strict subset of TypeScript—or at the very least future compatible—for this very reason.
1. https://github.com/giltayar/proposal-types-as-comments
-
I'll miss you, my love ...
I assumed the joke was about this
-
Microsoft proposes type syntax for JavaScript
It's actually Gil Taylor
The proposal on GitHub
flow
Posts with mentions or reviews of flow.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-03-07.
-
Eloquent JavaScript 4th edition (2024)
It's not as popular as typescript but not dead, it's consistently active [0] for a decade.
[0] https://github.com/facebook/flow/graphs/contributors
- Should I Rust or should I Go
-
Current thoughts on TypeScript, type safety, and its competition/presence in the ecosystem?
One alternative that I found was flow, thought haven't used it. There is a bevy of languages that transpiles to JS, though some seemingly lost their attention over time. Can the bridge to WASM contribute to this or is that digressing from the topic?
-
Typescript vs Flow? and why?
I think you are mistaking Flow unmaintained for Flow actively maintained.
-
Interesting ocaml mention in buck2 by fb
Hack and Flow are also written in OCaml.
-
I'll offer my two cents, since we're all taking another ride on the JavaScript hate train.
So... you're referring to flow?
-
Why Wolfram Tech Isn’t Open Source–A Dozen Reasons
It seems like Facebook doesn't have problem with releasing open source project [0] while keeping centralised control over it.
[0] https://github.com/facebook/flow
-
OCaml professionally
Facebook uses OCaml professionally, for [Flow](https://github.com/facebook/flow), their typechecker for JavaScript, and [Pyre](https://github.com/facebook/pyre-check), their typechecker for Python.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing proposal-types-as-comments and flow you can also consider the following projects:
corretto-17 - Amazon Corretto 17 is a no-cost, multi-platform, production-ready distribution of OpenJDK 17
tezos
browser-or-node - Check where your code is running. In the browser or in node.js environment.
HHVM - A virtual machine for executing programs written in Hack.
0.30000000000000004 - Floating Point Math Examples
rxv64 - xv6 OS
typescript-eslint - :sparkles: Monorepo for all the tooling which enables ESLint to support TypeScript
workflow-kotlin - A Swift and Kotlin library for making composable state machines, and UIs driven by those state machines.
coffeescript - Unfancy JavaScript
horizon - Horizon is a free EDA package
sqlite3 - The fastest and correct SQLite3 module for Deno runtime
pfff - Tools for code analysis, visualizations, or style-preserving source transformation.
proposal-types-as-comments vs corretto-17
flow vs tezos
proposal-types-as-comments vs browser-or-node
flow vs HHVM
proposal-types-as-comments vs 0.30000000000000004
flow vs rxv64
proposal-types-as-comments vs typescript-eslint
flow vs workflow-kotlin
proposal-types-as-comments vs coffeescript
flow vs horizon
proposal-types-as-comments vs sqlite3
flow vs pfff