proposal-explicit-resource-management VS tempo

The standard doesn't have anything to do with TypeScript, not sure where you got that from? https://github.com/tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-managemen...

The explicit resource management proposal tries to make it a bit easier for us, by allowing the resource to declare how it should be managed, rather than expecting us to clean everything up when we use the resource. We get a new keyword using to define a variable (rather than const or let), which tells the runtime to clean up the resource at the end of the function.

Enter the explicit resource management proposal, which describes — among many other things — a new using operator that was introduced in TypeScript 5.2 and is making its way into JavaScript. From the top of the README file, here’s what this proposal aims to do:

In addition to this, is the new (stage 3 even!)explicit resource management proposal[0], supported by TypeScript version >= 5.2[1]

Though I agree that async context is better fit for this generally, the RMP should be good for telemetry around objects that have defined lifetime semantics, which is a step in the right direction you can use today

[0]: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-managemen...

[1]: https://www.totaltypescript.com/typescript-5-2-new-keyword-u...

It's too early for that, https://github.com/tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-management

[3]: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-managemen...

I'm not _entirely_ sure which RAII you mean, but if you mean something like C#'s `using` or Java's `try-with-resources` or Python's `with`, then https://github.com/tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-managemen... and https://github.com/tc39/proposal-async-explicit-resource-man... are in stage 3 (of 4 stages) in ECMAScript's language proposal lifecycle and will be coming to a JS engine near you behind a flag soon-ish.

Grafana Tempo also switched from Protobuf storage format to Apache Parquet last year. It's fully open source, and the proposal is here: https://github.com/grafana/tempo/blob/main/docs/design-propo...

disclosure: I work for Grafana!

By combining Grafana Tempo with Tracetest, you can create a robust solution for monitoring and testing APIs with distributed tracing.

Last point: There's already a major open source project in the backend space called Tempo. You may want to reconsider the name.

I started the day with some Rust and spent the rest of the day in the Monitoring and Observability DevRoom. Most of the talks I attended were about OpenTelemetry and were very Grafana Labs-heavy. I knew Grafana and, to a less extent, Loki, and I had never seen Tempo (distributed tracing) and Phlare (profiling), and Mimir (backend for metrics, more backend-y than Prometheus?).

Grafana Tempo yes. Integrates seamlessly with Grafana (the dashboarding)